Sphagnum rubroflexuosum |
Sphagnum perichaetiale |
|
---|---|---|
sphagnum |
sphagnum |
|
Habit | Plants small, soft, fairly weak-stemmed; pale green to pale yellow brown; capitulum not 5-radiate or only weakly so, may be tinged with red; loose to somewhat compact. | Plants ± moderate-sized, compact and stiff-stemmed; forming dense to somewhat loose low cushions in often seasonally dry depressions. |
Stem(s) | leaves 0.7–1 mm (to 1.2 mm in hemiisophyllous forms) elongate-triangular to triangular-lingulate, apex obtuse-erose, to apiculate; usually fibrillose at least apically; in hemiisophyllous forms spreading and in anisophyllous forms appressed; hyaline cells often septate at base. |
leaves to 1.1 × 0.7 mm, commonly hemiisophyllous; hyaline cells non-ornamented, mostly 1–2-septate. |
Branches | moderately long and tapering, unranked to weakly 5-ranked, leaves not much elongated at distal end. |
short and blunt at distal end, leaves loosely spreading. |
Branch leaves | 1–1.7 mm, ovate-lanceolate, undulate and recurved when dry; hyaline cells on convex surface with 3–10 round pores per cell in the cell angles and free, on concave surface with round wall thinnings in the ends and angles. |
ovate, to 2.2 × 1.1 mm; ovate, hyaline cells non-ornamented, on proximal half of convex surface with small ringed pores or pseudopores in groups of three where the corners join and pseudopores along the commissures; chlorophyllous cells narrowly rectangular, lenticular to narrowly trapezoidal in transverse section; exposed equally on both surfaces or more broadly on concave surface; end walls not thickened. |
Sexual condition | unknown. |
dioicous. |
Capsule | with numerous pseudostomata. |
|
Spores | not seen. |
25–39 µm; surface smooth to irregularly and finely papillose; indistinct Y-mark on distal surface; proximal laesura more than 0.6 spore radius. |
Branch | fascicles with 2 spreading and 2–3 pendent branches.; branch stem cortex enlarged and with conspicuous retort cells. |
fascicles with 2 spreading and 1–2 pendent branches.; branch stems with hyaline cells non-ornamented, no or weak funnel-like projection of end walls of cortical cells, cortical cells with one large pore per cell on superficial wall. |
Sphagnum rubroflexuosum |
Sphagnum perichaetiale |
|
Phenology | Capsules common, mature late spring to early summer. | |
Habitat | Forming carpets in weakly minerotrophic fens | Mostly ruderal, wet depressions in sandy substrates, often in areas recently burned, also low to moderate-sized hummocks in Chamaecyparis swamps |
Elevation | moderate elevations | low to high elevations |
Distribution |
MD; PA |
AL; DE; FL; GA; LA; MD; MS; NC; NJ; SC; TX; VA; South America; se Asia; s Africa; Pacific Islands (New Zealand) |
Discussion | Sporophytes are unknown in Sphagnum rubroflexuosum. Compared to the closely related S. flexuosum, this species is paler and may have a reddish stem. Otherwise, identification must be made microscopically on the basis of branch leaf porosity. Although we have not seen this species in the field, it should be separable from S. majus, the only other large, aquatic species of sect. Cuspidata, in its range by traits of stem leaves and its color. Sphagnum majus is also typically a much darker brown. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
The compact growth form in thin but dense mats and occurrence in often dessication-prone sites distinguishes Sphagnum perichaetiale from any other species of sect. Sphagnum. The often quite stiffly spreading branch leaves give it a strong resemblance to S. compactum, but the latter’s small triangular stem leaves will readily distinguish that species. The branch leaf hyaline cells of S. perichaetiale have only a few pores on their convex surface, and they are typically small, thickened, and grouped in 3s where the cell corners meet. Similar species in sect. Sphagnum have more pores along the commissures, and they are more elliptical and not thickened. The often hemiisophyllous stem leaves are also diagnostic of S. perichaetiale within the section. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 27, p. 76. | FNA vol. 27, p. 54. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. brevicaule, S. cymbifolium var. ludovicianum, S. harperi, S. ludovicianum | |
Name authority | R. E. Andrus: Bryologist 91: 364, figs. 1–8. (1988) | Hampe: Linnaea 20: 66. (1847) |
Web links |