Sphagnum rubiginosum |
Sphagnum annulatum |
|
---|---|---|
|
sphagnum |
|
Habit | Plants slender to moderately robust, capitulum flat-topped to somewhate convex, terminal bud rather conspicuous, slightly to distinctly stellate; green to variegated green and brown-red to red-brown, lacking metallic sheen when dry. | Plants moderate-sized and weak-stemmed; in lawns and floating mats; brownish green, brown, reddish brown to chestnut-brown, often with bluish tint when dry, capitulum 5-radiate and flat-topped. |
Stem(s) | leaves broadly lingulate-spathulate to spatulate, widest at base and/or distal third, usually narrower in the mid region, 1–1.3 mm, apex narrowly to broadly truncate and ± fimbriate-lacerate, border narrow distally and expanded proximally to 0.25 width or more; hyaline cells efibrillose, irregularly rhombic to subquadrate, many cells 2–4-septate. |
leaves lingulate-triangular to triangular-lingulate, equal to or less than 1.2 mm, more or less spreading; apex obtuse; hyaline cells mostly fibrillose and nonseptate. |
Branches | unranked. |
straight to distinctly curved, leaves becoming substantially longer at distal end of the branch. |
Branch leaves | ovate-lanceolate, 1.1–1.4 mm, slightly concave, straight, apex involute; hyaline cells on convex surface grading from aporose to few small round pores near apex to numerous semi-elliptic pores along commissures in middle and base of leaf, concave surface with a few large irregular to circular pores (1–4) occupying most of the cell width. |
ovate-lanceolate, 1.5–2 mm, straight to slightly subsecund, only slightly undulate and recurved if at all; margin entire; hyaline cells on convex surface with numerous small free pores, on concave surface with numerous round free pores, cells relatively short in basal region (similar to mid region); chlorophyllous cells ± triangular in transverse section, just reaching concave surface or slightly enclosed. |
Sexual condition | autoicous. |
dioicous. |
Spores | 20–27 µm, moderately granulate-papillose on both surfaces, distinct raise Y-mark sculpture on distal surface; proximal laesura less than or equal to 0.5 spore radius. |
25–32 µm, finely papillose on both surfaces. |
Branch | fascicles with 3(4–5) spreading branches and 1–2 pendent branches. |
fascicles with 2 spreading and 1–2 pendent branches.; branch stems green, with cortex enlarged with conspicuous retort cells. |
Sphagnum rubiginosum |
Sphagnum annulatum |
|
Phenology | Capsules mature mid to late summer. | |
Habitat | Shaded areas in humid, spruce forests | Wet carpets, lawns, and mud bottoms in poor to medium fens, in mire-wide and mire-edge habitats |
Elevation | low to moderate elevations | low to high elevations |
Distribution |
AK; WA; BC; NF; Europe |
AK; ID; MI; MN; MT; NY; WA; WY; AB; BC; MB; NF; NT; ON; QC; YT; Eurasia |
Discussion | The sporophytes of Sphagnum rubiginosum are common. The geographic distribution is unclear because of the species’ recent description and possible confusion with S. girgensohnii. It is clearly distinct from S. girgensohnii in coloration, number of spreading branch fascicles, the common occurrence of sporophytes (rarely found with S. girgensohnii, and spore morophology. The conspicuous three spreading branches will separate this from all species of sect. Acutifolia except S. quinquefarium. The latter has 5-ranked branch leaves, while those of S. rubiginosum are unranked. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Sporophytes are rare in Sphagnum annulatum. Of the more wet-growing species, both S. cuspidatum and S. viride are typically much more green or yellow and have stem leaves with acute apices. Sphagnum jensenii is usually larger and has straight capitulum branches as opposed to the more curved branches of S. annulatum. Sphagnum majus normally has a denser and more rounded capitulum. Field experience in both Alaska and Scandanavia, where both species occur, does not support the view of H. A. Crum (1997) that S. annulatum and S. jensenii are simply ends of a continuum. Both species are usually readily separable in the field and look quite different in mixed populations. In North America at least S. annulatum is also considerably more widespread. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 27, p. 96. | FNA vol. 27, p. 64. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. jensenii var. annulatum | |
Name authority | Flatberg: Lindbergia 18: 61. (1993) | Warnstorf: Bot. Centralbl. 76: 422. (1898) |
Web links |
|