Sphagnum cribrosum |
Sphagnum tenerum |
|
---|---|---|
|
sphagnum |
|
Habit | Plants green, light brown to brown. | Plants ± robust, weak-stemmed, and compact, capitulum hemispherical, branches in capitulum short and blunt; typically mottled pale yellow-green and purplish red, without metallic sheen when dry. |
Stem(s) | leaves 1.4–1.8 mm, elongate-triangular, lingulate-triangular, hemiisophyllous forms elongate triangular-ovate, 1.4–1.8 mm, apex usually conspicuously toothed, border narrow at base (less than 0.25 width); hyaline cells narrowly rhombic to S-shaped, can be efibrillose and aporose but more commonly fibrillose and porose, 0–1-septate. |
|
Branches | turgid and terete, leaves, not 5-ranked. |
|
Branch leaves | ovate-ligulate, apex broad, rounded, and truncate, hyaline cells with 20–40 small (less than 0.25 cell diameter) in mostly 2 rows. |
ovate, 1.1–1.7 mm, slightly concave, straight, apex weakly involute and conspicuously toothed; hyaline cells on the convex surface with round to elliptic pores along the commissures, grading from moderate-sized pores near apex to large pores at leaf base, concave surface with large round pores throughout. |
Sexual condition | uncertain, monoicous or dioicous or possibly both. |
|
Spores | 22–25 µm, finely roughened. |
|
Branch | fascicles with 2 spreading and 1–2 pendent branches. |
|
Sphagnum cribrosum |
Sphagnum tenerum |
|
Habitat | Floating or stranded at margins of shallow acidic lakes and ponds | Damp sand and thin humus especially around pond margins, open savannas, and pine barrens |
Elevation | low elevations | low to moderate elevations |
Distribution |
FL; GA; MD; NC; SC |
AL; DC; DE; FL; GA; KY; MD; NC; NJ; NY; PA; RI; SC; TN; VA |
Discussion | Besides having different branch leaf porosity, Sphagnum cribrosum is usually distinguishable from the closely related S. macrophyllum by its paler brown color and distinctly broader and more truncate branch leaves. “Wave forms” of both S. cribrosum and S. macrophyllum, seemingly developed in response to growing in shallow water where wave action is common, can have very odd phenotypes that may look more like Fontinalis than Sphagnum. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Sporophytes are uncommon in Spagnum tenerum. The sexual condition is uncertain because of past taxonomic confusion with S. capillifolium (R. E. Andrus 1980). Sphagnum tenerum is usually described (incorrectly) as having hemiisophyllous stem leaves, and many collections of other species of sect. Acutifolia with such leaves have been called S. tenerum. When correctly characterized, S. tenerum is can be confused only with S. capillifolium, with which it has only a very small range overlap. Microscopically, besides the otherwise quite different S. angermanicum, S. tenerum is the only species of sect. Acutifolia with large round free pores in most of the branch leaf hyaline cells on their concave surfaces. See also discussion under 71. S. capillifolium. Sexual condition and spore features were taken from H. A. Crum (1984). The name Sphagnum evansii Warnstorf has also been used for this taxon. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 27, p. 61. | FNA vol. 27, p. 100. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. floridanum, S. macrophyllum var. floridanum | S. capillaceum var. tenerum, S. capillifolium var. tenerum, S. tenerum var. virginicum |
Name authority | Lindberg: Eur. Hvitmoss., 74. (1882) | Sullivant: in A. Gray, Manual ed. 2, 611. (1856) |
Web links |