Sphagnum bartlettianum |
Sphagnum mirum |
|
---|---|---|
Bartlett's sphagnum |
|
|
Habit | Plants ± moderate-sized, capitula flat-topped and stellate to some-what hemispherical; variegated pale yellowish and red, sometimes partially green or completely red; without metallic lustre when dry. | Plants fairly slender to moderate-sized, green; forming low dense hummocks. |
Stem(s) | leaves narrowly lingulate-triangular, 1.2–1.8 mm, apex acute to apiculate, border not developed much along margins and narrow at base (occupying less than 0.25 the width of the base); hyaline cells rhombic, mostly 0–1-septate. |
leaves generally longer than branch leaves, 1.1–1.7 mm, lingulate to lingulate-spathulate, hyaline cells mostly non-septate. |
Branches | usually strongly 5-ranked. |
terete. |
Branch leaves | narrowly ovate-lanceolate, 1.2–1.5 mm, concave, straight, apex strongly involute, border entire, hyaline cells on convex surface with 3–9 faintly ringed rounded-elliptic pores along the commissures often quite small apically, largely aporose on concave surface. |
1–1.4 mm, broadly ovate, with a narrow involute tip; hyaline cells only slightly bulging on either surface, in proximal half of leaf aporose on convex surface and with large faint pores on concave surface; internal commissural walls distinctly papillose; chlorophyllous cells elliptical to elliptical-triangular in transverse section, enclosed on both surfaces with the widest part in the leaf middle. |
Sexual condition | dioicous. |
dioicous. |
Spores | 19–28 µm; coarsely papillose on both surfaces with a distinct ridged border around perimeter of proximal surface; proximal laesura less than 0.5 spore radius. |
ca. 31 µm, ornamented by small somewhat amalgamated granulae. |
Branch | fascicles with 2 spreading and 1–2 pendent branches. |
fascicles of 2 spreading and 1–2 hanging branches.; branch stems with 1–2 layers of cortical cells. |
Sphagnum bartlettianum |
Sphagnum mirum |
|
Phenology | Capsules mature late spring to early summer. | Sporophytes abundant, capsules mature August. |
Habitat | Ecology poorly understood, more southern weakly minerotrophic sites such as the mires in the Pine Barrens of N.J. and the pocosins of the Atlantic coastal plain | Ecology poorly known but probably quite minerotrophic |
Elevation | low to moderate elevations | low elevations |
Distribution |
AK; AL; AR; CA; CT; DE; FL; IL; IN; KY; MA; MD; ME; MO; MS; NC; NH; NJ; NY; OH; OR; PA; RI; SC; TN; VA; VT; WI; WV; BC; NB; NF; NS; QC; Europe |
AK |
Discussion | Sporophytes are not common in Sphagnum bartlettianum. Confusion is most likely with S. rubellum, with which it frequently co-occurs in the northern part of its range. The ecology is poorly understood due to taxonomic confusion with S. rubellum; the latter species, however, is more typical of boreal poor fens and bogs. Sphagnum bartlettianum has a narrower stem leaf with a distinctly pointed and even apiculate tip, whereas the stem leaf on S. rubellum is quite rounded. The branch leaves of S. bartlettianum are also narrower than those of S. rubellum and are never subsecund as in the latter. Sphagnum quinquefarium has shorter and wider stem leaves as well as often having 3 spreading branches per fascicle. Sphagnum wilfii can appear quite similar and it does overlap the range of S. bartlettianum in coastal British Columbia and southeastern Alaska. Sphagnum wilfii has a stem leaf that is triangular to triangular-lingulate in contrast to the narrowly lingulate-triangular stem leaf of S. bartlettianum. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Sphagnum mirum has only been recently discovered and so far is known only from its type locality, where it was growing in a fen mixed with S. teres. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 27, p. 90. | FNA vol. 27, p. 58. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. bartlettianum var. roseum | |
Name authority | Warnstorf: in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. 51[III]: 105. (1911) | Flatberg & Thingsgaard: Bryologist 106: 501. (2003) |
Web links |