Sphagnum andersonianum |
Sphagnum fitzgeraldii |
|
---|---|---|
Anderson's sphagnum |
fitzgerald's sphagnum |
|
Habit | Plants small, soft and slender; capitulum small; pale pink to pale purplish red; without metallic lustre when dry. | Plants small and weak-stemmed, flaccid and ± plumose when submerged to (more frequently) sprawling in thin mats; capitulum ± compact and with a strong terminal bud; pale green to greenish white. |
Stem(s) | leaves lingulate, 0.9–1.2(–1.4) mm, apex rounded-erose to sometimes slightly apiculate, border moderately strong and broadened at the base (to 0.8 the width); hyaline cells rhombic, 0–1-septate, usually efibrillose. |
pale green; superficial cortex of 1–2 layers of thin-walled and well differentiated cells.; stem leaves large, ovate to oblong-ovate, ca. 2 mm, more or less spreading; apex rounded and serrulate; hyaline cells fibrillose and often 1–septate, convex surface generally aporose, concave surface with 1–several round pores per cell in ends and angles. |
Branches | not or slightly 5-ranked, lax. |
unranked to slightly 5-ranked, often short and blunt at distal end. |
Branch leaves | ovate, 0.8–1.4 mm, distinctly concave, straight, apex dentate and involute; border entire; hyaline cells on convex surface with elliptic pores along the commissures, grading from smaller pores near the apex to larger pores at the base, concave surface with large round pores on the proximal portions of the leaf. |
ovate to oblong-quadrate, 1.2–2.5 mm, not undulate or recurved when dry, strongly toothed across apex and serrulate on margins; hyaline cells with to 4 small round ringed pores at cell ends on convex surface, small round wall thinnings in the cell ends and angles on the concave surface; chlorophyllous cells trapezoidal in transverse section, more broadly exposed on the convex surface. |
Sexual condition | dioicous. |
monoicous. |
Spores | 18–24 µm; coarsely papillose on both surfaces; proximal laesura less than 0.5 the length of the spore radius. |
38–48 µm; both surfaces covered with fine to moderately coarse papillae; proximal laesura less than 0.4 spore radius. |
Branch | fascicles with 2 spreading and 1–2 pendent branches. |
fascicles with 1–2 spreading and 0–1 pendent branches.; branch stems green, with cortex enlarged with conspicuous retort cells. |
Sphagnum andersonianum |
Sphagnum fitzgeraldii |
|
Habitat | Weakly minerotrophic | Commonly in prostrate mats on damp sand, often in recently burned or cleared areas, also occasionally floating in ditches |
Elevation | low to moderate elevations | low elevations |
Distribution |
AK; CT; MA; ME; NH; NY; RI; VT; BC; NF; NS; QC; Europe |
AL; FL; GA; LA; MS; NC; SC; VA |
Discussion | Sporophytes are uncommon in Sphagnum andersonianum. Its distribution is uncertain due to past taxonomic confusion with S. rubellum, S. capillifolium, and other closely related species in sect. Acutifolia. This is one of the most hydrophytic species of the section and is often associated with S. angustifolium, S. fallax, and S. rubellum. It is often not easily distinguished from S. rubellum, with which it may intergrade in a manner similar to that already demonstrated for S. rubellum and S. capillifolium by N. Cronberg (1997, 1998). Phenotypically S. andersonianum is a softer, paler plant with branch leaves that are more ovate and concave on branches that are less 5-ranked. Sphagnum rubellum also has the branch leaves sometimes subsecund while in S. andersonianum they are straight. Ecologically S. rubellum is an open mire species of usually ombrotrophic conditions, where it often forms hummocks, while S. andersonianum occurs in more sheltered sites where there is some mineral influence. Where they occur together, S. rubellum is on the tops of hummocks and S. andersonianum is on the hummock sides and bases. Microscopically S. rubellum has stem leaves with at least some of the hyaline cells twice septate, while in S. andersonianum none are twice septate. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Sporophytes of Sphagnum fitzgeraldii are common, being immersed or exserted. This species is found largely on the Atlantic coastal plain. The wide truncate branch leaves easily distinguish it in most situations. Floating plants are not as quickly identified but can be distinguished from other species of sect. Cuspidata by the branch leaves wider than those of similar species. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 27, p. 88. | FNA vol. 27, p. 67. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. mohrianum | |
Name authority | R. E. Andrus: Bryologist 83: 60, figs. 1–7. (1980) | Lesquereu×& James: Man. 23. (1884) |
Web links |