Smilax pumila |
Smilax hugeri |
|
---|---|---|
sarsaparilla vine, sarsparilla vine |
Huger's carrionflower |
|
Habit | Subshrubs or vines; rhizomes black, knotted, 5–6 × 2 cm, often with white to pinkish stolons. | Herbs; rhizomes knotty, slender. |
Stems | perennial, prostrate to clambering, branching, slender, to 1 m, ± woody, densely woolly-pubescent, usually prickly (especially at base). |
annual, erect, 2–5 m, herbaceous, glabrous; prickles absent. |
Leaves | mostly evergreen, ± evenly disposed; petiole 0.05–0.25 cm, often longer on sterile shoots; blade gray-green, drying to ashy gray-green, obovate to ovate-lanceolate, with 3 prominent veins, 6–10.5 × 5–8 cm, glabrous adaxially, densely puberulent abaxially, base cordate to deeply notched, margins entire, apex bluntly pointed. |
few, disposed distally or evenly distributed, subequal; petiole shorter than blade; tendrils absent or rudimentary; blade oblong, oblong-ovate, or sometimes oval, 2.5–12 × 1.5–7.5 cm, not glaucous, puberulent abaxially, base rounded to slightly cordate, margins entire, apex broadly rounded to obtuse or abruptly pointed. |
Umbels | 1–7, axillary to leaves, 5–16-flowered, loose, spherical; peduncle 0.2–0.8 cm, shorter than to 1.5 as long as petiole of subtending leaf. |
1–3, proximalmost axillary to bracts, 5–12-flowered. |
Flowers | perianth yellowish; tepals 3–4 mm; anthers much shorter than filaments; ovule 1 per locule; pedicel thin, 0.1–0.4 cm. |
perianth greenish; tepals 3–3.5 mm; anthers shorter than filaments; ovules (1–)2 per locule. |
Berries | red, ovoid, 5–8 mm, with acute beaks, not glaucous. |
globose, 8–10 mm diam., glaucous. |
2n | = 26. |
|
Smilax pumila |
Smilax hugeri |
|
Phenology | Flowering Oct–Nov. | Flowering Apr–May. |
Habitat | Woods, along streams, sandy soil | Moist, mixed woods and wooded slopes |
Distribution |
AL; AR; FL; GA; LA; MS; SC; TX
|
AL; FL; GA; NC; SC; TN
|
Discussion | The red, pointed fruits and densely pubescent herbage of Smilax pumila are distinctive. In Louisiana, the dried leaves are used to prepare a tea for upset stomach. The name Smilax humilis Miller, which predates S. pumila by 20 years and recently has been determined to apply also to this species, has been proposed for rejection (J. L. Reveal 2000). If that proposal is not adopted, the correct name will be S. humilis. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Smilax hugeri is distinguished from S. ecirrhata and S. biltmoreana mainly by leaf morphology. Specimens from Tennessee are not sharply distinct from S. ecirrhata. J. K. Mangaly (1968) cited this as possible evidence of divergence from that species. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 26, p. 476. | FNA vol. 26, p. 474. |
Parent taxa | Smilacaceae > Smilax | Smilacaceae > Smilax |
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. humilis, S. pubera, S. puberula | Nemexia hugeri, S. ecirrhata var. hugeri |
Name authority | Walter: Fl. Carol., 244. (1788) | (Small) J. B. Norton ex Pennell: Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 43: 420. (1916) |
Web links |