Smilax auriculata |
Smilax hugeri |
|
---|---|---|
earleaf greenbrier, wild-bamboo |
Huger's carrionflower |
|
Habit | Herbs; rhizomes knotty, slender. | |
Stems | perennial, climbing, branching zigzag, terete, 5–9 m × 5–8 mm, woody, glabrous; prickles numerous, sparse or absent distally, flattened, rigid, stout, to 4 mm. |
annual, erect, 2–5 m, herbaceous, glabrous; prickles absent. |
Leaves | evergreen; petiole 0.5–1.2 cm; blade green abaxially, drying to brownish green, narrowly ovate to ovate-elliptic, with 3 prominent veins, secondary veins obscure to prominent, 4.5–6(–8.5) × 2–3.5 cm, not glaucous, glabrous or minutely pubescent abaxially, base auriculate, pandurate, or rounded, cuneate at insertion of petiole, margins entire, apex acute to abruptly deflexed point. |
few, disposed distally or evenly distributed, subequal; petiole shorter than blade; tendrils absent or rudimentary; blade oblong, oblong-ovate, or sometimes oval, 2.5–12 × 1.5–7.5 cm, not glaucous, puberulent abaxially, base rounded to slightly cordate, margins entire, apex broadly rounded to obtuse or abruptly pointed. |
Umbels | 3–8, terminal, axillary to leaves, 5–8(–25)-flowered, loose; peduncle 0.2–1.5 cm. |
1–3, proximalmost axillary to bracts, 5–12-flowered. |
Flowers | perianth green; tepals: staminate 6–8 mm, pistillate 3–4 mm; ovule 1 per locule; pedicel 0.2–1 cm. |
perianth greenish; tepals 3–3.5 mm; anthers shorter than filaments; ovules (1–)2 per locule. |
Berries | purplish maroon, purple, or black, ovoid to flattened, 5–7 mm, glaucous. |
globose, 8–10 mm diam., glaucous. |
Vines | ; rhizomes linear or dense masses of potatolike tubers. |
|
2n | = 26. |
|
Smilax auriculata |
Smilax hugeri |
|
Phenology | Flowering Apr–Jul. | Flowering Apr–May. |
Habitat | Dunes and sandy flatwoods, full sun | Moist, mixed woods and wooded slopes |
Elevation | 0–100 m (0–300 ft) | |
Distribution |
AL; FL; GA; LA; MS; NC; SC; West Indies (Bahamas)
|
AL; FL; GA; NC; SC; TN
|
Discussion | Smilax hugeri is distinguished from S. ecirrhata and S. biltmoreana mainly by leaf morphology. Specimens from Tennessee are not sharply distinct from S. ecirrhata. J. K. Mangaly (1968) cited this as possible evidence of divergence from that species. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
|
Source | FNA vol. 26, p. 471. | FNA vol. 26, p. 474. |
Parent taxa | Smilacaceae > Smilax | Smilacaceae > Smilax |
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | S. beyrichii, S. lata | Nemexia hugeri, S. ecirrhata var. hugeri |
Name authority | Walter: Fl. Carol., 245. (1788) | (Small) J. B. Norton ex Pennell: Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 43: 420. (1916) |
Web links |