Sidotheca |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
starry puncturebract |
|||||||||
Habit | Herbs, annual; taproots slender. | ||||||||
Stems | arising directly from the root, spreading or prostrate, sometimes erect, solid, not fistulose or disarticulating into ringlike segments, glabrous or sparsely glandular. |
||||||||
Leaves | persistent or quickly deciduous, basal, rosulate; petioles indistinct; blade broadly linear or spatulate to oblanceolate, margins entire, strigose and glandular. |
||||||||
Inflorescences | terminal, cymose; branches mostly dichotomous, not brittle or disarticulating into segments, round, glabrous or sparsely glandular; bracts (2–)3(–4) at first node, 2–3 at distal nodes, distinct or connate, often positioned to side of node, scalelike, triangular or linear to ovate and 3-lobed, awned, sparsely glandular. |
||||||||
Peduncles | present or absent, erect to spreading. |
||||||||
Involucres | 1 per node, not ribbed, tubular, narrowly turbinate to funnelform; teeth 5(–6), awn-tipped. |
||||||||
Flowers | 2–5(–10) per involucre at any single time during full anthesis; perianth white to rose or greenish yellow to red, funnelform when open, tubular when closed, hirsute and sparsely glandular abaxially; tepals 6, connate 1/4–1/3 their length, monomorphic, 3–5-lobed or laciniate apically; stamens 9; filaments basally adnate, glabrous or minutely papillate basally; anthers red to maroon, ellipsoid or oblong to oval. |
||||||||
Achenes | usually included, golden- to red-brown, not winged, 3-gonous, glabrous. |
||||||||
Seeds | embryo curved. |
||||||||
x | = 20. |
||||||||
Sidotheca |
|||||||||
Distribution |
CA; nw Mexico |
||||||||
Discussion | Species 3 (3 in the flora). Sidotheca is allied to Eriogonum subg. Ganysma, approaching E. inerme in terms of foliar and overall habit. The trilobed to laciniate tepals resemble those of certain species of Chorizanthe. It is possible, as B. Ertter (1980) suggested, that the taxon was derived from Acanthoscyphus. In the 1950s, G. J. Goodman (1904–1999) proposed its recognition at generic rank, using the parahomonym “Neoxytheca.” (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
||||||||
Key |
|
||||||||
Source | FNA vol. 5, p. 439. | ||||||||
Parent taxa | |||||||||
Subordinate taxa | |||||||||
Synonyms | Oxytheca section Neoxytheca | ||||||||
Name authority | Reveal: Harvard Pap. Bot. 9: 211. (2004) | ||||||||
Web links |
|