Salix humboldtiana
Salix silicicola
Humboldt's willow
blanket-leaf willow
branches yellow-brown, gray-brown, or red-brown, not glaucous, villous in patches to glabrescent;
branchlets gray-brown or red-brown, very densely villous.
stipules foliaceous, apex acute to acuminate;
petiole convex to flat adaxially, 5–12 mm, villous or tomentose adaxially, (strongly ventricose around floral buds);
largest medial blade (apparently hypostomatous but surfaces obscured by hairs), narrowly oblong, narrowly elliptic, elliptic, or obovate, 36–84 × 19–40 mm, 1.8–3.6 times as long as wide, base convex or cuneate, margins slightly revolute, entire, apex convex or acuminate, abaxial surface very densely woolly-tomentose, hairs wavy, adaxial dull, moderately to very densely, villous-tomentose;
proximal blade margins entire;
juvenile blade color obscured by hairs, very densely tomentose-woolly abaxially, hairs white.
adaxial nectary oblong to narrowly oblong, 0.6–1.5 mm;
filaments distinct;
anthers yellow, ellipsoid, 0.6–0.7 mm.
adaxial nectary oblong or obtriangular, 0.5–1.1 mm;
stipe 0–0.3 mm;
ovary pyriform, beak gradually tapering to styles;
ovules 12–14 per ovary;
styles 1.2–2.2 mm;
stigmas 0.52–0.75–1 mm.
4–7 mm.
humboldtiana Willdenow: Humboldt willow is not known to occur in the flora area.
is characterized by: trees, 4–25 m;
branches highly brittle at base, bud-scale margins distinct and overlapping adaxially;
stipules on late leaves rudimentary or foliaceous;
largest medial leaf blade usually linear, abaxial surface not glaucous, adaxial dull; pistillate bract deciduous after flowering;
stamens 3–7;
capsules with distinct, often raised, white veins.;
it occurs throughout much of Mexico to central Chile.
flowering before leaves emerge; staminate stout, 40–56 × 14–15 mm, flowering branchlet 0 mm; pistillate densely flowered, slender, 35–125(–130 in fruit) mm, flowering branchlet 0 mm;
floral bract brown or black, 2–3 mm, apex convex to rounded, abaxially hairy, hairs straight.
= 38.
Salix humboldtiana
Salix silicicola
Salix humboldtiana is closely related to S. nigra in its generally narrow leaf blades, which are not glaucous abaxially. The two differ in the following characters: S. humboldtiana has leaf blades linear to sometimes narrowly oblong (10–28.6 times as long as wide), ovaries usually ovoid to ellipsoid, ovary walls often stomatiferous and with raised, white veins, and capsule valves relatively thick, slightly recurved. S. nigra has leaf blades usually narrowly lanceolate (6–13 times as long as wide), ovaries pyriform to obclavate, ovary walls neither stomatiferous nor notably veined, and capsule valves relatively thin and strongly recurved. Both species occur in Chihuahua, Mexico.
The report by R. I. Lonard et al. (1991) that specimens identified as Salix nigra from the lower Rio Grande, Texas, resemble S. humboldtiana in having strongly veined capsules suggests that S. humboldtiana, or intergrades with that species, may occur in Texas. Attempts to locate a voucher specimen were unsuccessful; because strongly veined capsules are diagnostic, further field study is indicated.
An earlier name, Salix chilensis Molina, has been applied to this species; it does not seem to pertain to this taxon (C. K. Schneider 1918).
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
Comparisons of genetic variation in Salix alaxensis var. alaxensis from British Columbia and S. silicicola from Lake Athabasca sand dunes, Saskatchewan, based on isozyme loci, fit predicted relationships between progenitor and derived taxon (B. G. Purdy and R. J. Bayer 1995). Allelic diversity of S. silicicola was a subset of that of S. alaxensis, there was less genetic variation in S. silicicola than in S. alaxensis, and interspecific genetic variation within the two species was similar and relatively very high. This suggested a recent origin for the derived S. silicicola.
Salix silicicola is a uniform population that differs from S. alaxensis in its very densely villous or tomentose leaves and branchlets. These characters seem to be an adaptation to reduce sand abrasion and water loss in a sand dune environment. It is unlikely that it would have evolved in situ but probably derived from a pre-adapted source such as the one represented by specimens of putative S. silicicola from Pelly Lake, Nunavut. The isozyme study did not include specimens from that population or of S. alaxensis from Northwest Territories from which S. silicicola is likely to have been derived. Occurrence of S. silicicola-like plants in northern continental Nunavut suggests that during the late Pleistocene, it had a wider range, which now is represented by two disjunct populations. The question of appropriate taxonomic rank for the derived taxon is still unresolved. Although S. silicicola is different from S. alaxensis in its general appearance, they are very similar genetically, and argument could be made for treating them as varieties (B. Boivin 1966b).
Hybrids:
Salix silicicola forms natural hybrids with S. brachycarpa var. psammophila.
of conservation concern
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
WildflowerSearch
iNaturalist
USDA Plants Database
