Rumex arcticus
Rumex palustris
arctic dock
marsh dock
erect, simple or branched in distal 2/3 (then with few, comparatively short branches), 10–70(–100) cm.
erect, normally branched in distal 2/3, occasionally almost near base, 10–60(–100) cm.
ocrea deciduous or partially persistent at maturity;
blade narrowly lanceolate, lanceolate, or oblong-lanceolate, normally 5–15(–20) × 1.5–5 cm, base cuneate to broadly cuneate, rarely truncate or very weakly cordate, margins entire or rarely indistinctly repand, flat, apex acute or subacute.
ocrea normally deciduous, rarely partially persistent at maturity;
blade lanceolate or oblong-lanceolate, gradually narrowed at both ends, (10–)15–30(–35) × 1.5–6 cm, more than 4 times as long as wide, base narrowly to broadly cuneate, margins entire, flat or, rarely, weakly undulate, apex acute, rarely subobtuse.
terminal, occupying distal 1/2–2/3 of stem, interrupted, paniculate, simple or nearly so (branches, when present usually less than 7–8 cm).
terminal, occupying distal 1/2 of stem, rarely more, reddish brown at maturity, usually lax, interrupted in proximal 1/2 or 2/3, broadly paniculate;
branches spreading.
articulated in proximal 1/3, filiform, 5–13(–17) mm, usually not more than 2–2.5 times as long as inner tepals, articulation weakly evident, not swollen.
articulated near base or at least in proximal 1/3, filiform, 3–6 mm, articulation weakly evident.
7–15 in whorls;
inner tepals ovate, 4.5–7.5(–8) × 4–6(–7) mm, base truncate to weakly cordate, margins entire, apex obtuse or subacute;
tubercles absent.
15–25(–30) in rather dense whorls;
inner tepals narrowly triangular, narrowly rhombic-triangular, or linguliform, (2.5–)3–3.5(–4) × 1.2–1.5(–2) mm (excluding teeth), normally ca. 2 times as long as wide, base truncate or broadly cuneate, margins prominently dentate, apex acute very rarely subacute, straight, teeth (1–)2–3, normally at each side of margins, subulate-filiform, bristlelike, straight, 1–2(–3) mm, usually as long as width of inner tepals;
tubercles 3, equal or subequal, apex obtuse, smooth.
reddish brown, 3–4 × 1.5–2 mm.
light brown, 0.9–1.75 × 0.6–1 mm.
= 40, 120, ca. 170, ca. 200.
= 60.
Rumex arcticus
Rumex palustris
Rumex arcticus is polymorphic, as are R. aquaticus in the narrow sense and R. occidentalis. However, unlike R. aquaticus and R. occidentalus, it is represented by at least two chromosome races (G. A. Mulligan and C. Frankton 1972; Á. Löve 1986). Plants morphologically transitional between R. arcticus and R. aquaticus were described from Kamchatka as R. kamtschadalus (= R. arcticus var. kamtschadalus). The same forms occasionally occur in northwestern North America. According to Á. Löve and D. Löve (1975b) and Á. Löve (1986), they are usually tetraploids (2n = 40) and deserve recognition at the species level. However, they are not always morphologically distinct from R. arcticus. The group needs additional study, and at present I prefer to keep the tetraploid plants provisionally within R. arcticus, regarding them as var. kamtschadalus.
A few highly sterile specimens with mostly abortive flowers, which I have seen in Alaskan herbarium material, most probably represent hybrids between tetraploid and 12-ploid races of the R. aquaticus group.
Plants with unusually wide, triangular-oblong, or almost ovate leaves were described as var. latifolius Tolmatchew. This seems to be a predominant variety on the Beringian coast of Chukotka and Wrangel and Ratmanov islands (A. I. Tolmachew 1966). I also have seen at least two collections of this variety from the western coast of Alaska. The enigmatic var. perlatus Hultén may belong here (see discussion under 8. R. lapponicus).
Rumex arcticus has been reported from Churchill in northeastern Manitoba (H. J. Scoggan 1978–1979, part 3). That record needs confirmation because some northern forms of R. arcticus and R. occidentalis are similar.
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
Rumex palustris was reported for the first time from North America by J. E. Dawson (1979) based on specimens misidentified as R. maritimus and R. pulcher, collected in 1877 and 1959, respectively. Rumex palustris is not known to be invasive, and these collections probably represent only occasional, chance introductions.
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
PNW Herbaria
WildflowerSearch
iNaturalist
USDA Plants Database
CA
