Rubus cuneifolius |
Rubus nivalis |
|
---|---|---|
sand blackberry |
dwarf snow bramble, snow bramble, snow dewberry, snow dwarf bramble, snow raspberry |
|
Habit | Shrubs, 5–10(–30) dm, armed. | Shrubs, to 1.5 dm, armed. |
Stems | biennial, erect, rarely arching, sparsely to densely hairy (especially young), eglandular, not pruinose; bark not papery, peeling; prickles usually dense, hooked to retrorse, usually stout, 3–6 mm, broad-based. |
perennial, creeping, sparsely hairy, glabrescent, eglandular, not pruinose; prickles sparse, strongly retrorse, stout, to 1 mm, broad-based. |
Leaves | deciduous to semievergreen, usually ternate, sometimes palmately compound; stipules filiform or linear to lanceolate, 3–15 mm; leaflets 3–5, terminal cuneate to obovate, 2–6 × 3–4 cm, base cuneate, unlobed, margins serrate, rarely doubly serrate, apex broadly rounded to subtruncate, often cuspidate, abaxial surfaces often with prickles on midveins, densely gray- to white-hairy, sparsely to densely sessile-glandular. |
evergreen, simple or ternate; stipules adnate to petioles, broadly elliptic to ovate, (6–)8–10 mm; blade ovate to cordate, (2.5–)3–5(–8) cm, lobe or leaflet base cordate, shallowly 3-lobed, margins coarsely, singly or doubly dentate, apex acute to obtuse, abaxial surfaces with prickles along midveins, glabrous or sparsely hairy, eglandular, both surfaces lustrous fresh. |
Inflorescences | terminal on short shoots, sometimes appearing axillary, (1–)3–5(–12)-flowered, cymiform. |
1–2-flowered. |
Pedicels | unarmed or prickles sparse to moderate, hooked to retrorse, moderately to densely hairy, eglandular or sparsely to moderately sessile-glandular. |
prickles scattered, retrorse, moderately to densely hairy, eglandular. |
Flowers | bisexual; petals white, elliptic to obovate, 5–15 mm; filaments filiform; ovaries glabrous or glabrate. |
bisexual; petals magenta to pink, elliptic to oblanceolate or spatulate, (5–)8–10 mm; filaments filiform; ovaries moderately hairy, styles glabrous. |
Fruits | black, globose to cylindric, 0.6–2 cm; drupelets 15–50, strongly coherent, separating with torus attached. |
red, hemispheric, 0.4–1 cm; drupelets 3–10, not coherent, separating from torus. |
2n | = 21, 28. |
= 14. |
Rubus cuneifolius |
Rubus nivalis |
|
Phenology | Flowering May–Jul. | Flowering Jun–Sep. |
Habitat | Dry to damp open areas, sandy or rocky soil | Moist, semishaded forests, glades, moist soil, logged areas |
Elevation | 0–300 m (0–1000 ft) | 0–1700 m (0–5600 ft) |
Distribution |
AL; CT; DC; DE; FL; GA; LA; MA; MD; MS; NC; NH; NJ; NY; PA; SC; TN; VA
|
CA; ID; OR; WA; BC
|
Discussion | Rubus cuneifolius is characteristic of the Coastal Plain and Piedmont. The species is distinguished from most other blackberries in the flora area by its usually strongly erect and shrub-forming habit and abaxial leaflet surfaces often with dense white to gray indument; it may be confused with R. pascuus. Rubus cuneifolius has white petals and cuneate to obovate leaflets with usually revolute margins, the proximal third entire; R. pascuus has pale pink to white petals and ovate to broadly elliptic leaflets with the margins flat and entire only at base. Rubus longii Fernald may represent hybridization between R. cuneifolius and another, yet-undetermined, blackberry (perhaps R. pascuus). Hybrids of R. cuneifolius and R. hispidus can be found around abandoned commercial cranberry bogs in New Jersey (G. Moore, pers. obs.). Rubus cuneifolius is introduced in South Africa and is officially recognized there as a noxious weed (L. Henderson 1995; T. Olkers and M. P. Hill 1999; H. Klein 2002). Preliminary examination of plants identified as R. cuneifolius from South Africa has shown that the plants are not R. cuneifolius but may be hybrids involving R. cuneifolius and another species. The following nothospecies names are based on putative hybrids involving Rubus cuneifolius and: R. pensilvanicus (R. ×acer L. H. Bailey, R. ×acer var. subacer L. H. Bailey, R. ×argutinus L. H. Bailey, R. ×floridensis L. H. Bailey); R. trivialis (R. ×inferior L. H. Bailey). (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Rubus nivalis is recognized by its creeping, prickly stems, simple to ternate, evergreen leaves, broadly elliptic to ovate stipules, two leaflets, relatively small flowers, and magenta to pink petals. Its closest relative is likely the Mexican R. pumilus Focke. Asian species previously classified in subg. Chamaebatus (Focke) Focke are hexaploid (M. M. Thompson 1997) and not phylogenetically close; R. nivalis appears to be sister to all blackberries of subg. Rubus (L. A. Alice and C. S. Campbell 1999; Alice et al. 2008). The fruits of Rubus nivalis are eaten fresh, stewed, and canned by the Hoh and Quileute Indians (A. B. Reagan 1936). The only known specimen of Rubus nivalis from California was collected in 1961 from Del Norte County at 1250 m near the Oregon border. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 9, p. 39. | FNA vol. 9, p. 45. |
Parent taxa | Rosaceae > subfam. Rosoideae > tribe Rubeae > Rubus | Rosaceae > subfam. Rosoideae > tribe Rubeae > Rubus |
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | R. audax, R. chapmanii, R. cuneifolius var. angustior, R. cuneifolius var. austrifer, R. cuneifolius var. spiniceps, R. cuneifolius var. subellipticus, R. georgiensis, R. probabilis, R. probativus, R. randolphiorum, R. sejunctus | |
Name authority | Pursh: Fl. Amer. Sept. 1: 347. (1813) | Douglas: in W. J. Hooker, Fl. Bor.-Amer. 1: 181. (1832) |
Web links |
|