Potentilla pseudosericea
Potentilla litoralis
Mono cinquefoil, Pennsylvania cinquefoil, silky cinquefoil, strigose cinquefoil
coast cinquefoil, Pennsylvania cinquefoil, potentille du littoral
sometimes sheathed with marcescent whole leaves.
decumbent to ascending, (0.2–)0.5–1.5(–2.2) dm.
decumbent to nearly erect, (0.4–)1–4.5(–6) dm.
usually palmate, rarely also ternate on same plant or subpalmate, (1–)2–6(–8) cm;
petiole (0.5–)1–2.5 cm, long hairs abundant to dense, ± appressed, 0.5–1.2 mm, stiff, verrucose, crisped hairs common, cottony hairs absent, glands sparse to abundant but usually obscured;
leaflets (3–)5–7, proximalmost separated by 0–2 mm, central ± obovate, (0.5–)1–1.5(–2) × (0.3–)0.5–0.8(–1) cm, petiolules 0–1 mm, distal 3/4 to nearly whole margin incised 3/4+ to midvein, teeth 2–4(–5) per side, (2–)3–6(–10) mm, apical tufts 0.5 mm, abaxial surfaces white, long hairs common to abundant, cottony-crisped hairs dense, short hairs and glands absent or obscured, adaxial grayish green, long hairs abundant, 0.5–1.5 mm, ± stiff, short-crisped (rarely ± cottony) hairs sparse to common, glands absent or sparse.
subpinnate to subpalmate, (3–)4–15(–25) cm;
petiole (1–)2–8(–15) cm, long hairs sparse to abundant, appressed to rarely ascending, ± 1 mm, ± stiff, short hairs absent or sparse, cottony or crisped hairs absent, glands ± sparse;
leaflets 2–3 per side, on distal 1/6–1/3(–1/2) of leaf axis, ± overlapping, terminal ones narrowly lanceolate to narrowly obovate, (1.5–)2–5(–7) × 1–2.5 cm, margins revolute, incised 3/4+ to midvein, undivided medial blade 2–10 mm wide, teeth (2–)5–8 per side, ± linear-elliptic, surfaces usually ± dissimilar, abaxial green to grayish, long hairs ± abundant especially on veins, 0.5–1.5 mm, weak, short hairs absent or sparse, cottony hairs absent, crisped hairs absent or sparse to abundant, glands ± abundant, adaxial ± green, long hairs sparse to common, ± appressed, 0.5–1.5 mm, short hairs absent or sparse, cottony hairs absent, crisped hairs absent or sparse, glands ± abundant.
1–3.
(1–)2–4.
(1–)3–10(–20)-flowered, congested or ± elongating in fruit, branch angle 5–30°.
(1–)5–30-flowered, congested, scarcely lengthening in fruit.
0.2–0.7 cm, proximal to 1.3 cm.
0.2–1 cm (proximal to 3 cm).
epicalyx bractlets narrowly elliptic, (1–)1.5–2.5(–3) × 0.5–1 mm;
hypanthium 3–4 mm diam.;
sepals 2–4(–5) mm, apex obtuse to bluntly acute, glands sparse, obscured;
petals pale yellow, not overlapping, 2–4 × 2–3 mm, ± equal to sepals (slightly longer than in Inyo County);
filaments 1–1.5 mm, anthers 0.3–0.5 mm;
carpels 30–50, styles 1–1.2 mm.
epicalyx bractlets narrowly, rarely broadly, elliptic to linear, 2.5–5(–6) × 1(–2) mm, lengths ± 2/3 to equal to sepals, margins ± revolute (at least in fruit);
hypanthium 3–5 mm diam.;
sepals 3–6 mm, apex ± acute, abaxial surfaces: venation moderate, glands abundant, evident at least distally;
petals yellow, 3–5 × 2–4 mm, lengths ± equal to sepals;
filaments (0.5–)1–1.5 mm, anthers 0.3–0.5 mm;
carpels 50–100, styles papillate-swollen in proximal 1/2–3/4+, 1–1.5 mm.
1–1.4 mm.
± 1 mm, smooth to faintly rugose.
= 28, 56.
Potentilla pseudosericea
Potentilla litoralis
Potentilla pseudosericea is currently confirmed only from the central Sierra Nevada and Sweetwater and White mountains of California (B. Ertter 2008). The species is similar to P. modesta but has a more tightly strigose, silvery vestiture and more numerous and deeply incised leaflets.
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
Revolute epicalyx bractlets and visible glands on the sepal tips are the most reliable characteristics to distinguish Potentilla litoralis from P. bipinnatifida where their ranges overlap in the northern Great Plains. The former is also more likely to be decumbent-ascending and tends to darken more in drying. Intermediates occur, as well as possible hybrids with P. bimundorum, P. hippiana, and P. pensylvanica.
Rydberg described Potentilla litoralis to accommodate the coastal phase of this species, concentrated around the Gulf of St. Lawrence and along the north Atlantic Coast as far south as New Hampshire. Potentilla pectinata Rafinesque was briefly adopted as the older name (for example, Frère Marie-Victorin 1935); it is both superfluous and a later homonym (B. Boivin 1952). The homotypic synonyms P. pensylvanica var. glabrata (Lehmann) S. Watson, P. bipinnatifida var. glabrata (Lehmann) Kohli & Packer, and P. glabrella Rydberg have been misapplied to P. litoralis; the type is a specimen of P. ovina var. ovina (sect. Multijugae) (J. Soják 1996). The type of P. dissecta Pursh, traditionally applied to P. glaucophylla (sect. Graciles), is closest to this species but has palmate leaves; ambiguity has led to the name being rejected (B. Ertter et al. 2008).
The current circumscription of Potentilla litoralis includes prairie populations extending through the northern Great Plains and boreal regions into eastern Alaska; those plants have generally been called P. virgulata when not combined with P. bipinnatifida, P. multifida in the broad sense, or P. pensylvanica. Outlying populations occur at least as far south as Wyoming (including the type of P. virgulata), central Nevada (possibly as introductions), and, possibly, Colorado.
Other than the tendency of prairie plants to be somewhat larger and more erect than the coastal plants, no significant morphologic distinctions have been found to match the differences in habitat and distribution. Based on their distribution map, B. L. Kohli and J. G. Packer (1976) considered the coastal and prairie populations, as well as what is here separated as Potentilla jepsonii, to comprise a single taxon, which they called P. bipinnatifida var. glabrata (Lehmann) Kohli & Packer (misapplied).
If Potentilla litoralis is treated as a variety of another species, var. virgulata has priority at varietal rank.
Unequivocal Potentilla litoralis barely enters Alaska; the majority of collections from central, western, and northern Alaska previously placed in P. litoralis represent an undescribed taxon whose dimensions are not included in the preceding description. Significant differences include more deeply incised leaflets with fewer teeth, flat, linear epicalyx bractlets, and larger petals. Some collections from around Kotzebue with relatively wide sepals and sparse glands may indicate hybridization with P. bimundorum.
(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
CA
WildflowerSearch
iNaturalist
USDA Plants Database
BC
Go Botany
MI Flora
MN Wildflowers
PNW Herbaria
