Rhinotropis californica(synonym of Polygala californica) |
Rhinotropis nitida |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California milkwort, milkwort |
shining milkwort |
|||||
Habit | Herbs, sometimes suffrutescent, multi-stemmed, often forming a ground cover, 0.5–3.5 dm. | Herbs, multi-stemmed, 0.5–2 dm; roots with bright red to orange cortex, loosely exfoliating in thin layers. | ||||
Stems | laxly erect, decumbent, or prostrate, pubescent to subglabrous, hairs incurved. |
spreading to erect, pubescent, hairs incurved and appressed. |
||||
Leaves | sessile or subsessile; blade ovate, elliptic, or obovate, 7–50(–60) × 3–20(–26) mm, base usually rounded to acute, sometimes cuneate, apex rounded to acute, surfaces pubescent, hairs incurved. |
subsessile or petiolate, petiole to 3 mm; blade ovate, lanceolate, elliptic, or linear, 5–35(–40) × 1–9 mm, base rounded to cuneate, apex acute to rounded or acuminate, surfaces subglabrous or pubescent, hairs incurved. |
||||
Racemes | terminal or leaf-opposed, 1–4(–5) × 1.8–3 cm; rachis not thorn-tipped; peduncle 0–1 cm; bracts early deciduous, linear to lanceolate. |
terminal, usually leaf-opposed, sometimes near stem base, 0.8–5(–6) × 1–2.5 cm; rachis not thorn-tipped; peduncle 0–0.5 cm; bracts persistent, elliptic, ovate, or lanceolate. |
||||
Pedicels | (2.5–)3.5–8.5 mm, sparsely pubescent or glabrous. |
1.5–4 mm, pubescent or glabrous. |
||||
Flowers | usually pink, rarely white, keel distally yellow (fading white), (2.5–)9–14.5 mm, cleistogamous and semi-cleistogamous flowers mostly 2.5–5 mm, intergrading with chasmogamous flowers; sepals deciduous, elliptic, 4–6.5 mm, pubescent or glabrous; wings obovate, (7.5–)8–12 × 2.5–6 mm, glabrous or sparsely pubescent; keel (7–)8–11 mm, sac glabrous (sometimes proximally ciliate), beak oblong, (1.2–)1.6–3 × 0.7–1 mm (mostly absent in cleistogamous flowers), usually notched or contorted abaxially, rarely subentire, pubescent. |
pink to cream, wings sometimes greenish, (4.4–)5–7.5 mm; upper sepal persistent, others deciduous, ovate, lower sepals ovate to elliptic or obovate, (1.6–)1.9–4.1 mm, pubescent or glabrous; wings obovate to elliptic, 3–7 × 1.4–3.2 mm, pubescent or glabrous; keel 2.7–6.1 mm, sac usually glabrous, rarely sparsely incurved-pubescent distally, beak oblong or bluntly rounded, (0.2–)0.6–1.7 × 0.2–0.8 mm (rarely absent in var. tamaulipana), glabrous or pubescent. |
||||
Capsules | ellipsoid to ovoid, 7.3–10.5 × 4.5–7 mm, in cleistogamous and semi-cleistogamous flowers 4.5–8 mm, base obtuse, rounded, or subtruncate, margins with narrow, entire or slightly erose wing, glabrous, margins sometimes ciliolate. |
ellipsoid, sometimes broadly so, 3.7–6.2 × 2.4–4.3 mm, base subtruncate to acute, margins with very narrow wing or not winged, pubescent. |
||||
Seeds | 3.5–6 mm, densely pubescent; aril 1.7–4 mm, less than 1/2 length of seed. |
2.7–4.9 mm, densely pubescent; aril 1.3–2.6 mm, lobes to 1/2 length of seed. |
||||
Cleistogamous | or semi-cleistogamous flowers often present terminally, on much reduced scale-leaved lateral branches from proximal (or distal) leaf axils, or terminally on leafy branches that are often leaf-opposed. |
|||||
2n | = 18. |
|||||
Rhinotropis californica |
Rhinotropis nitida |
|||||
Phenology | Flowering spring–summer. | |||||
Habitat | Rocky or clay soils, deep duff, rich soils, serpentine soils, slopes or drainages, full sun to deep shade, open habitat, chaparral, mixed evergreen forests, oak woodlands, coniferous forests. | |||||
Elevation | 10–1400 m. [30–4600 ft.] | |||||
Distribution |
CA; OR
|
n Mexico; Texas |
||||
Discussion | Rhinotropis californica occurs in western California and Oregon. Cleistogamous and semi-cleistogamous flowers can appear earlier than chasmogamous flowers. Their flowers, fruits, and seeds are similar to those of chasmogamous flowers, but typically are smaller and without the keel beak. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Varieties 4 (2 in the flora). Rhinotropis nitida is closely related to R. lindheimeri, with seven varieties recognized between the two. According to T. L. Wendt (1978), although the differences between the two species are fairly small, the recognition of a single species would obscure the differences in the evolution of several superficially similar taxa. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
||||
Key |
|
|||||
Source | FNA vol. 10. | FNA vol. 10. | ||||
Parent taxa | ||||||
Sibling taxa | ||||||
Subordinate taxa | ||||||
Synonyms | Polygalacalifornica nuttall | Polygalanitida brandegee | ||||
Name authority | (Nuttall) J. R. Abbott: J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5: 134. (2011) | (Brandegee) J. R. Abbott: J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5: 135. (2011) | ||||
Web links |