Oenothera hispida |
Oenothera filiformis |
|
---|---|---|
|
bee-blossom, longflower beeblossom |
|
Habit | Herbs perennial, spreading by rhizomes (forming colonies), strigillose, often also villous; from taproot. | Herbs usually robust winter-annual, sometimes biennial, moderately to densely strigillose, sometimes also glandular puberulent, villous and/or short-hirtellous; from fleshy taproot. |
Stems | ascending to decumbent, several-branched from base, usually also irregularly branched distally, sometimes with a single, unbranched stem, 20–60(–120) cm. |
usually well-branched distal to base, (50–)100–400 cm. |
Leaves | in a basal rosette and cauline, 0.5–7.5(–9.5) × 0.1–2.2 cm, blade narrowly lanceolate to elliptic, margins subentire or shallowly sinuate-dentate. |
in a basal rosette and cauline, basal 8–15(–40) × 1.5–3.6 cm, blade lyrate, margins irregularly toothed to lobed; cauline 1.5–13 × 0.5–3 cm, blade narrowly elliptic to elliptic or lanceolate, margins subentire or shallowly undulate-denticulate. |
Flowers | 4-merous, zygomorphic, opening near sunset; floral tube 4–14 mm; sepals 7–11(–14) mm; petals white, fading red, slightly unequal, elliptic, 6–10 mm, clawed; filaments 4–8.5 mm, anthers 3–6 mm, pollen 90–100% fertile; style 12–26 mm, stigma exserted beyond anthers at anthesis. |
4-merous, zygomorphic, opening at sunset; floral tube 4–13(–15) mm; sepals 7–18 mm; petals white, fading pink, elliptic to elliptic-obovate, 7–15 mm; filaments 5–13 mm, anthers 1.5–5 mm, pollen 90–100% fertile; style 12–34 mm, stigma exserted beyond anthers at anthesis. |
Capsules | erect, pyramidal in distal 1/2, conspicuously bulging at base of distal pyramidal part, strongly 4-angled, conspicuously bulging at base, abruptly constricted to terete proximal part, 7–13 × 3–5 mm; sessile. |
ellipsoid or ovoid, sharply 4-angled, 4.5–7 × 1.5–2.5 mm; sessile. |
Seeds | (2 or)3 or 4(–8), reddish brown, 2–2.5 × 1–1.3 mm. |
2–4, yellowish to reddish brown, 1.3–3 × 0.7–1.3 mm. |
2n | = 28. |
= 14. |
Oenothera hispida |
Oenothera filiformis |
|
Phenology | Flowering May–Jul(–Nov). | Flowering (Jun–)Jul–Oct(–Nov). |
Habitat | Sandy loam. | Open woods, fields, along streams, sandy soil, disturbed sites, ditch banks, roadsides, railway embankments. |
Elevation | 60–1900 m. (200–6200 ft.) | 10–500 m. (0–1600 ft.) |
Distribution |
AR; CA; GA; TX; c Mexico |
AL; AR; CO; CT; IA; IL; IN; KS; KY; LA; MA; MD; MI; MO; MS; NE; OH; OK; PA; TN; TX; WI; ON
|
Discussion | Oenothera hispida is native across the eastern half of Texas, south through Mexico to Oaxaca and Puebla; it is naturalized in Sevier County, Arkansas, coastal southern California, and Glynn County Georgia. P. H. Raven and D. P. Gregory (1972[1973]) reported Oenothera hispida to be self-incompatible. It occasionally forms hybrids with O. suffrutescens. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
P. H. Raven and D. P. Gregory (1972[1973]) found various levels of hybridization and intergradation between Oenothera filiformis and O. lindheimeri to occur where their ranges overlap. In the region of geographical overlap, most populations of O. filiformis are strigillose in the inflorescences and have evening-opening flowers, while O. lindheimeri is villous in the inflorescences, and has large morning-opening flowers. Moreover, O. lindheimeri occurs only on black clay prairie soil, while O. filiformis occurs in light, sandy soil, as it does throughout its range, and in more disturbed areas. Despite these differences, Raven and Gregory found hybridization between these species scattered across an area from eastern Texas across Louisiana to Alabama. At some locations there is apparently no hybridization, while at others hybrids were uncommon to relatively common. Intermediate morning-blooming plants in Alabama appear to represent evidence of past hybridization since O. lindheimeri does not occur there. Many of the individuals they tested had somewhat reduced pollen fertility (40–70% fertile). They suspected that habitat disturbance was primarily responsible in many cases, but they also detected what may have been intergradation resulting from past hybridization outside of the current distribution of O. lindheimeri. Many of these individual cases deserve further investigation to better understand the dynamics of the interactions between these species and if any of the interactions have led to stabilization of novel populations that might be recognized taxonomically. Very few collections have been made from areas on the periphery of the range of Oenothera filiformis (southern Ontario, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania), and populations in these areas probably represent recent human-based introductions. P. H. Raven and D. P. Gregory (1972[1973]) determined O. filiformis to be self-incompatible. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 10. | FNA vol. 10. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Synonyms | Gaura hispida, G. crispa, G. drummondii, G. roemeriana, O. xenogaura, Schizocarya crispa, S. drummondii | Gaura filiformis, G. biennis var. pitcheri, G. filiformis var. kearneyi, G. longiflora |
Name authority | (Bentham) W. L. Wagner, Hoch & Zarucchi: PhytoKeys 50: 26. (2015) | (Small) W. L. Wagner & Hoch: Syst. Bot. Monogr. 83: 212. (2007) |
Web links |