Horkelia sect. Horkelia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Habit | Plants forming tufts or mats, green to grayish, obscurely (and minutely) glandular, resinously aromatic, often strongly so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stems | decumbent or ascending to erect, (0.5–)1–10(–12) dm. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basal leaves | usually planar, sometimes ± cylindric; stipules usually entire, sometimes basally lobed; leaflets (1–)3–16(–20) per side, separate to overlapping, divided ± 1/6–3/4+ to midrib into 3–30(–60) teeth or lobes not restricted to apex. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inflorescences | open to congested, flowers arranged individually, in usually non-capitate glomerules, and/or in corymbiform clusters. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pedicels | remaining straight, 1–30(–40) mm. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flowers | epicalyx bractlets narrowly elliptic-lanceolate to broadly ovate, 0.5–3 mm wide, usually entire, sometimes toothed; hypanthium interior pilose or glabrous; sepals acute; petals white, oblong-oblanceolate to round, apex obtuse to truncate to emarginate; filaments white, glabrous, anthers longer than wide; carpels 10–200(–220). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Achenes | 0.8–2 mm, usually smooth or slightly rugose, sometimes merely roughened. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Horkelia sect. Horkelia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution |
CA; nw Mexico |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion | Species 9 (9 in the flora). Section Horkelia encompasses the species that are most commonly encountered in heavily populated areas of California. Plants are notably glandular-viscid (unless obscured by dense vestiture) and have a distinctive resinous odor. Previous revisions (for example, P. A. Rydberg 1908c; D. D. Keck 1938) have placed Horkelia frondosa (here treated as H. californica var. frondosa) at the beginning, implying that this is the least derived expression within the genus. Such an assumption is based on its gross resemblance to sympatric members of Drymocallis; molecular evidence (T. Eriksson et al. 1998; M. Lundberg et al. 2009; C. Dobeš and J. Paule 2010) confirms that this similarity is superficial. If, as speculated above, species composing sect. Hispidulae are relicts of the original radiation, then H. californica var. frondosa is actually one of the more derived members of the genus. Species within sect. Horkelia have been ordered here according to that interpretation. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source | FNA vol. 9, p. 250. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent taxa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinate taxa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonyms | H. unranked Californicae, H. section Californicae, H. unranked Cuneatae, H. section Cuneatae, H. unranked Tenuilobae, H. section Tenuilobae | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name authority | unknown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web links |