The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

mare's-tail

mountain mare's-tail

Habit Herbs, perennial; rhizomatous, emergent aquatics in fresh or brackish water.
Rhizomes

1 mm diam.

Stems

erect, glabrous.

15–100 mm.

Leaves

cauline, whorled;

petiole absent;

blade not fleshy, not leathery (fleshy or leathery in H. tetraphylla), margins entire.

on mid portions of emergent shoots in whorls of 5–7, linear, 2–10 × 0.2–0.5 mm, midvein often conspicuous, lateral veins absent, apex acute, tip translucent, callous, not curled in dried plants.

Inflorescences

axillary, flowers solitary;

bracts absent.

Pedicels

present (proximal) or absent (distal);

bracteoles absent.

Flowers

bisexual or unisexual;

calyx a minute rim adhering to summit of inferior ovary;

petals 0;

stamen 1, adnate to ovary, filaments glabrous;

staminode 0;

ovary 1-locular, placentation apical;

stigma linear along surfaces of style.

unisexual, staminate in leaf whorls proximal to pistillate;

filaments longer than anthers.

Fruits

drupes.

Drupes

1.2 × 1 mm.

Seeds

1, brownish, globular, wings absent.

x

= 8.

2n

= 16.

Hippuris

Hippuris montana

Phenology Flowering summer.
Habitat Shallow streams, stream banks, bogs, seeps, upper montane and alpine zones.
Elevation 100–1400 m. (300–4600 ft.)
Distribution
from USDA
North America; South America; Eurasia [Introduced in Australia]
[BONAP county map]
from FNA
AK; WA; AB; BC; NT; YT
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Species 4 (4 in the flora).

Leaf characteristics of Hippuris used here are derived from whorls on the emergent portions of the stems; morphology of submerged leaves differs sharply from that of emergent shoots.

M. E. McCully and H. M. Dale (1961) proposed that the taxa treated below all could be expressions of phenotypic plasticity of Hippuris vulgaris developed in different regimes of salts and photoperiod; this was not accepted by E. Hultén (1973), nor is it accepted here. Number of leaves in a whorl varies among plants and even on the same stem. Nevertheless, there are clear limits and discontinuities in leaf number and shape among taxa, which are well-correlated with less variable characters as well as with ecology and geography.

Hippuris has been placed in Halagoraceae or in Hippuridaceae as a monogeneric family. Molecular phylogenetic studies now place it in Plantaginaceae (D. C. Albach et al. 2005).

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Hippuris montana differs from other species of Hippuris by its diminutive size and the tendency for the plants to be woven into the moss carpet; it is probably often overlooked by collectors.

The single occurrence reported by N. N. Tzvelev (1980) in the Russian Far East (lower Amur River) of an otherwise North American endemic has not been confirmed.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Key
1. Flowers unisexual; leaves 2–10 mm, midveins often conspicuous, lateral veins absent; stems 15–100 mm; rhizomes 1 mm diam.
H. montana
1. Flowers bisexual; leaves 3–35 mm, midveins inconspicuous, lateral veins present, sometimes obscure; stems 80–500 mm; rhizomes (2–)3–7 mm diam.
→ 2
2. Leaves on mid portions of emergent shoots in whorls of (7 or)8 or 9(–12), tips often curled in dried plants; filaments longer than anthers.
H. vulgaris
2. Leaves on mid portions of emergent shoots in whorls of 3–6(or 7), tips not curled in dried plants; filaments equal to or shorter than anthers.
→ 3
3. Leaves on mid portions of emergent shoots in whorls of (5 or)6(or 7), linear to narrowly oblong or lanceolate, 0.5–1.5 mm wide, apices subacute.
H. lanceolata
3. Leaves on mid portions of emergent shoots in whorls of 3–5(or 6), oblanceolate or oblong to broadly obovate, 2–8 mm wide, apices obtuse, rounded, or blunt.
H. tetraphylla
Source FNA vol. 17, p. 55. Authors: Reidar Elven, David F. Murray, Heidi Solstad. FNA vol. 17, p. 56.
Parent taxa Plantaginaceae Plantaginaceae > Hippuris
Sibling taxa
H. lanceolata, H. tetraphylla, H. vulgaris
Subordinate taxa
H. lanceolata, H. montana, H. tetraphylla, H. vulgaris
Name authority Linnaeus: Sp. Pl. 1: 4. (1753): Gen. Pl. ed. 5, 4. (1754) Ledebour e× Reichenbach: Iconogr. Bot. Pl. Crit. 1: 71, plate 86, fig. 181. (1823)
Web links