Flora of North America species comparison

Gentiana puberulenta is evidently extirpated from Ontario, Louisiana, Maryland, and New York, where outlying prairie communities have largely been eliminated by agricultural and urban expansion.

The name Gentiana puberula Michaux 1803, not Franchet 1890, and the homotypic synonym Dasystephana puberula (Michaux) Small have long and often been misapplied to this species but are typified by a specimen of G. saponaria.

Some small plants of Gentiana puberulenta appear similar to G. affinis var. affinis, but only a few specimens appear actually to be hybrids between these species. Where their ranges approach each other, the flowers of G. affinis are generally much smaller than those of G. puberulenta, and the corolla lobes of G. affinis are generally less than twice as long as the free portions of the plicae, whereas those of G. puberulenta are more than twice as long. The flower size of G. affinis var. ovata more closely approaches that of G. puberulenta, but in that variety, the range of which does not overlap that of G. puberulenta, the leaves are usually ovate to elliptic rather than narrowly oblong-lanceolate, and the distal internodes are often about as long as or longer than the leaves, in contrast to the proportionately shorter internodes of G. puberulenta. For further guidance in distinguishing between G. puberulenta and G. affinis, see discussion under 13. G. affinis.

Hybrids of Gentiana puberulenta with the strikingly dissimilar G. andrewsii, constituting G. × billingtonii Farwell (as species), and with G. flavida, constituting G. × curtisii J. S. Pringle, occur in the tall-grass prairies. Hybrids with G. saponaria formerly occurred in western Maryland.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Gentiana setigera is endemic to Gasquet Mountain, Del Norte County, and Red Mountain, Mendocino County, California, and a small area in Josephine County, Oregon. At the Oregon site, it has been called G. bisetaea or Waldo gentian. Reports from other sites have been based on G. plurisetosa, with which G. setigera has often been confused.

K. L. Chambers and J. Greenleaf (1989) and C. T. Mason (1991) distinguished Gentiana plurisetosa from G. setigera, clarified the nomenclature of G. setigera, and included G. bisetaea in G. setigera. Prior to those studies, all components of this complex had been of conservation concern. With G. plurisetosa comprising only a part of this complex, and with G. setigera now being more narrowly circumscribed, conservation concern remains appropriate for both of these species.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)