Flora of North America species comparison

The name Gentiana alba Muhlenberg has often been applied to this species. Uncertainty had long persisted, first as to whether the name G. alba was validly published by G. H. E. Muhlenberg in 1813, then, after that publication had been deemed invalid, whether it was validated by T. Nuttall in 1818. A group of nomenclatural authorities considered this issue on behalf of this flora and concluded that neither of those publications of the name G. alba had been valid, and that G. flavida A. Gray was the earliest validly published name for this species (K. N. Gandhi, pers. comm.).

Outlying eastern populations of Gentiana flavida in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia are no longer extant, and the continued existence of other peripheral populations in isolated prairie remnants is precarious. Reports from Manitoba have been based on misidentified G. rubricaulis. A report from Maryland was based on the misreading of a label of a specimen actually from Indiana (studies for this flora).

In contrast to those of the other species of Gentiana in the flora area, with the exceptions of G. clausa and G. latidens, the calyx lobes of G. flavida spread widely, with keels like shelf brackets decurrent on the tube.

Morphological variation in Gentiana flavida should be given further study. According to J. T. Curtis (1959), plants of this species from the northern part of its range, as seen in the field, appear distinctly different in inflorescence form from plants native farther south.

In the tall-grass prairies, Gentiana flavida hybridizes with G. andrewsii, producing G. × pallidocyanea J. S. Pringle, and G. puberulenta, producing G. × curtisii J. S. Pringle. Reports of G. flavida with the corollas distally lilac have been based on plants derived from such hybridization, probably through backcrossing.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Gentiana saponaria is believed to be extirpated from the District of Columbia. Reports from west of the range given here have been based mostly on specimens of G. andrewsii × G. puberulenta, occasionally on G. flavida × G. puberulenta or other hybrids. Some reports from the northeastern United States, including all records from Vermont and upstate New York, were based on specimens of G. clausa that antedate the recognition of that species in standard floras. Other reports have been based on misidentified G. linearis.

The name Gentiana puberula Michaux is typified by a specimen of G. saponaria but has generally been misapplied to G. puberulenta.

Plants from the northern parts of the range of Gentiana saponaria tend to have corollas more nearly closed than those from the southern parts of the range, but their corollas are not so firmly closed as those of G. clausa, the corolla lobes are larger, the summits of the plicae are usually more or less visible in herbarium specimens, and the shape of the calyx lobes is distinctively different. Plants of G. saponaria in the southernmost part of its range tend to have somewhat larger and more open corollas, approaching G. catesbaei in these respects, but they differ in their elliptic rather than ovate leaves and calyx lobes mostly shorter than or about as long as the tube rather than longer. Plants from bog and lake-shore habitats in Watauga County, North Carolina, at 1200 m, above the usual altitudinal range of G. saponaria, have attracted interest because of their linear to narrowly elliptic leaves mostly 3–9 mm wide. Their calyx and corolla morphology strongly supports their inclusion in G. saponaria, as does the occurrence of occasional plants with wider leaves in the same populations. Plants with similarly narrow leaves occur elsewhere in the range of G. saponaria and include those that have been identified as G. cherokeensis.

The epithet saponaria refers to a resemblance of the stems and leaves of this species to those of soapwort or bouncing-bet, Saponaria officinalis (Caryophyllaceae). Soaplike substances were not obtained from the gentian, so the invention of “soap gentian” as a common name is not appropriate.

Gentiana saponaria hybridizes with G. andrewsii relatively frequently in the Ohio Valley and occasionally elsewhere. Hybrids with G. catesbaei, G. clausa, G. decora, and G. puberulenta are also known.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)