Flora of North America species comparison

The corollas of Gentiana andrewsii, G. austromontana, and G. clausa all remain completely and tightly closed but are pollinated by bumblebees, which force open the corollas. The fresh corollas of G. clausa are rounded at the summit, with the plicae concealed by the true lobes. In contrast, the fresh corollas of G. andrewsii and G. austromontana are more acute, with the plicae forming much or all of the visible summit. The corolla lobes of G. clausa are about as long and as wide as the free portions of the plicae, whereas those of G. andrewsii and G. austromontana are distinctly narrower than the plicae. Also, in contrast to those of other species of Gentiana in the flora area except for G. flavida and G. latidens, the calyx lobes of G. clausa when fresh spread almost horizontally rather than being nearly erect.

Reports of Gentiana clausa from Indiana to Missouri and elsewhere west of the range given here have been based on specimens of G. andrewsii var. dakotica, second- or later-generation plants derived from G. andrewsii × G. puberulenta, or other hybrids and introgressants. In these plants, in contrast to G. clausa, the sepals are lanceolate and nearly erect, and the lobes of the intact corolla do not entirely conceal the plicae.

Gentiana clausa is largely isolated ecologically and geographically, but a few hybrids with G. andrewsii, G. austromontana, G. decora, and G. saponaria are known.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

In contrast to the deep green stems and leaves of Gentiana prostrata, the vegetative parts of G. fremontii are much paler. G. Engelmann (1879) described plants of G. fremontii as having a pale, sickly appearance, and J. A. Ewan annotated specimens as having been yellowish when seen in the field, reminiscent of a fungus or broomrape (Aphyllon or Orobanche). This suggests that mycorrhizal symbiosis is especially significant in this species, but its trophic ecology has not been studied.

Gentiana fremontii differs further from G. prostrata in having obovoid capsules less than twice as long as wide, generally not fully exserted from the marcescent corolla, narrowly winged distally along the sutures, with valves that eventually separate nearly to the base, whereas the capsules of G. prostrata are compressed-cylindric, more than twice as long as wide, often fully exserted at maturity, not winged, with the valves separating only above the middle. Also, although both species vary in this respect, G. fremontii more often has the flower parts in fives.

The names Gentiana aquatica Linnaeus and Chondrophylla aquatica (Linnaeus) W. A. Weber have often been applied to this species. Gentiana fremontii, although similar to the Siberian and Chinese G. aquatica, appears to differ consistently in the wider, more conspicuous white margins of its leaves, longer and proportionately narrower mid-cauline leaves, usually white rather than blue corollas, and corolla plicae that generally have jagged rather than entire summits. The illegitimate name G. humilis Steven 1812, not Salisbury 1796, has also been applied to G. fremontii, but the North American plants are not now considered conspecific with the type from Azerbaijan.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)