Flora of North America species comparison

Euphorbia virgata has caused significant economic and ecological impact over large portions of the United States and Canada. It is part of a taxonomically complex group of species native to Europe and Asia, and there has been much confusion over the naming of the species that has become widely established in the New World (A. Radcliffe-Smith 1985; P. M. Catling and G. Mitrow 2012). There has been speculation that hybridization and polyploidy have played a role in the weediness of leafy spurge, and it is possible that the widespread occurrence of leafy spurge in North America is at least partly due to multiple introductions in grain imported from Eurasia (Ma J. S. 2010). Nonetheless, a re-evaluation of the leafy spurge complex by Berry et al. (unpubl.) revealed that E. esula Linnaeus and E. virgata are two distinct, albeit related species. The true E. esula is restricted in range to certain parts of Europe and shows little tendency toward weediness where it occurs. In contrast, E. virgata is much more widespread across Europe and temperate Asia, where it shows the same weedy characteristics as leafy spurge in the New World. More importantly, it is morphologically consistent with the North American material of leafy spurge.

According to D. V. Geltman (1998), the best way to distinguish morphologically between Euphorbia virgata and E. esula is by differences in their leaf shape. In E. virgata, the leaf blades are linear to linear-oblanceolate or linear-oblong, 6–15 times longer than wide, with margins that are parallel or almost parallel at the middle of the blade; the apex is usually acute, and the base is truncate or abruptly attenuate. In E. esula, the leaf blades are oblanceolate to obovate-elliptic (distinctly wider toward apex), 3–8(–10) times longer than wide, with margins not parallel at the middle of the leaf; the apex is rounded to subacute, and the base is gradually attenuate to cuneate.

There are some herbarium specimens of Euphorbia esula from North America that indicate it probably occurred sporadically in certain states in the late 1800s and early 1900s, but the authors have no evidence that it has persisted in any of those places. Therefore in this treatment, E. esula is considered to be a waif in the North American flora and, by excluding it here, the authors hope to avoid confusion between it and the widespread E. virgata.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

As treated here, Euphorbia spathulata is a wide-ranging and variable species. J. B. S. Norton (1900) recognized a number of segregates (for example, E. arkansana, E. dictyosperma, and E. obtusata) all of which are included here in a broadly defined E. spathulata. The only segregate species that has been widely recognized in regional floras is E. obtusata (for example, M. L. Fernald 1950; T. S. Cooperrider 1995; G. Yatskievych 1999–2013, vol. 2). Authors have generally distinguished the eastern North American E. obtusata from the western E. spathulata by the former's larger seeds (1.7–2.3 mm versus 1.5–1.7 mm) with smooth (versus reticulate) surfaces, larger involucres, red (versus yellow) involucral glands, and cordate-clasping (versus rounded to subcordate) dichasial bracts. Examination of specimens of E. spathulata in the broad sense from throughout North America showed that there is some geographic patterning to seed size and surface sculpturing, but the variation does not segregate cleanly into two discrete taxa. Plants from western North America typically have small seeds (1.5–1.7 mm) with reticulate surfaces, although some western individuals have seeds 1.8–1.9 mm long with reticulate surfaces. Plants from Texas generally have small seeds (1.5–1.6 mm) but with the surfaces either reticulate or completely smooth. Plants from adjacent Louisiana have small seeds with faintly reticulate to almost bumpy surfaces. Plants from eastern North America have larger seeds (2–2.3 mm) with usually smooth surfaces, although individuals from Tennessee and the Carolinas have faintly reticulate surfaces. Involucre height, gland color, and the shape of the dichasial bracts do not segregate with seed size as previous treatments have suggested.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)