Draba ventosa |
|
---|---|
wind river Draba, wind river whitlow-grass |
|
Habit | Perennials; (cespitose); caudex branched (covered with persistent leaves, branches creeping, sometimes terminating in sterile rosettes); scapose. |
Stems | unbranched, (0.1–)0.2–0.4(–0.6) dm, densely pubescent throughout, trichomes 2–6-rayed, 0.1–0.6 mm. |
Basal leaves | (imbricate); rosulate; subsessile; petiole base and margin not ciliate; blade obovate to oblanceolate, (0.4–)0.5–1 cm × 1.5–4.5 mm, margins entire, surfaces densely pubescent with stalked, 2–6-rayed trichomes, (0.1–)0.2–0.9 mm. |
Cauline leaves | 0. |
Racemes | 5–10(–16)-flowered, ebracteate, slightly elongated in fruit; rachis not flexuous, densely pubescent as stem. |
Flowers | sepals broadly ovate, 2–2.5 mm, pubescent, (trichomes short-stalked, 2–6-rayed); petals yellow, obovate, 3.5–5.5 × 1.5–3 mm; anthers oblong, 0.5–0.6 mm. |
Fruiting pedicels | horizontal to divaricate-ascending, straight or slightly curved upward, 2–7(–9) mm, densely pubescent, trichomes 2–6-rayed, (0.1–0.6 mm). |
Fruits | suborbicular to broadly ovate, plane, inflated basally, flattened distally, 4–7.5(–9) × 3.5–5 mm; valves densely pubescent, trichomes short-stalked, 2–6-rayed, 0.15–0.5 mm; ovules 8–12 per ovary; style (0.5–)0.7–1.4 mm. |
Seeds | oblong, 1.4–1.9 × 0.9–1.2 mm. |
2n | = 36. |
Draba ventosa |
|
Phenology | Flowering Jul–Aug. |
Habitat | Talus slopes and alpine tundra |
Elevation | 2000-4000 m (6600-13100 ft) |
Distribution |
CO; UT; WY; AB; BC; YT |
Discussion | G. A. Mulligan (1971b) first reported apomixis in Draba ventosa based on studies of Canadian populations. This has now been confirmed in one of the southernmost populations (Duchesne County, Utah; M. D. Windham, unpubl.) as well. The species is easily overlooked and the large geographic gap between the Canadian and United States populations is likely to be narrowed or eliminated by additional collecting in western Montana. The limits of this species were expanded by C. L. Hitchcock (1941) to include D. ruaxes, but there are clear differences between them that support their recognition as distinct species. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 7, p. 344. |
Parent taxa | |
Sibling taxa | |
Name authority | A. Gray: Amer. Naturalist 8: 212. (1874) |
Web links |