Cystopteris utahensis |
|
---|---|
Utah bladderfern |
|
Stems | creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, heavily beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent; scales lanceolate, ± clathrate, radial walls dark brown, thick, luminae clear. |
Leaves | monomorphic, clustered at stem apex, to 45 cm, nearly all bearing sori. |
Petiole | green to straw-colored throughout or darker near base, shorter than blade, base sparsely scaly. |
Blade | deltate to narrowly deltate, 2-pinnate-pinnatifid, usually widest at or near base, apex short-attenuate; rachis and costae with unicellular, gland-tipped hairs, misshapen bulblets present or absent; axils of pinnae usually with multicellular, gland-tipped hairs. |
Pinnae | typically perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate; proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged; basal basiscopic pinnules sessile or short-stalked, base truncate to obtuse, distal pinnae ovate to oblong. |
Veins | directed into teeth and notches. |
Indusia | cup-shaped, apex truncate, with scattered, unicellular, gland-tipped hairs. |
Spores | spiny, usually 39–48 µm. 2n = 168. |
Cystopteris utahensis |
|
Phenology | Sporulating summer–fall. |
Habitat | Cracks and ledges on cliffs, on calcareous substrates including sandstone, limestone, and dacite |
Elevation | 1300–2700 m (4300–8900 ft) |
Distribution |
AZ; CO; TX; UT |
Discussion | Cystopteris utahensis is an allopolyploid derived from the diploid species C. bulbifera and C. reevesiana (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991). Because C. utahensis shares one parent (C. bulbifera) with C. tennesseensis and because of morphologic similarities between C. reevesiana and C. protrusa (the second diploid parent of C. tennesseensis), populations of C. utahensis were previously considered to have originated by long-distance dispersal from eastern populations of C. tennesseensis. Genetic studies using isozyme markers, however, indicated that C. utahensis was a distinct species and stimulated the discovery of morphologic criteria for distinguishing it from its eastern cousin. When combined with the geographic separation of the two tetraploids, the minor differences in indument features provide a means of circumscribing this genetically distinct species. Potential confusion in identifying C. utahensis arises because sterile triploid hybrids may form when it is sympatric with the more common diploid C. reevesiana. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 2. |
Parent taxa | |
Sibling taxa | |
Name authority | Windham & Haufler: in Haufler & Windham, Amer. Fern J. 81: 13. (1991) |
Web links |