The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

Tennessee bladder fern

bladder-fern, brittle fern, fragile fern

Habit Plants terrestrial or on rock.
Stems

creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, heavily beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent;

scales usually tan to light brown, lanceolate, radial walls tan to brown, thin, luminae tan.

short- to long-creeping, stolons absent.

Leaves

monomorphic, crowded near stem apex, to 45 cm, nearly all bearing sori.

monomorphic, dying back in winter.

Petiole

variable in color but mostly dark brown at base, gradually becoming straw-colored distally, shorter than blade, sparsely scaly at base.

1/3–3 times length of blades, base often swollen and persisting as trophopod over winter;

vascular bundles 2, lateral, round or oblong in cross section.

Blade

deltate to narrowly deltate, 2-pinnate-pinnatifid, usually widest at or near base, apex short-attenuate;

rachis and costae with occasional unicellular, gland-tipped hairs, with or without bulblets (usually misshapen);

axils of pinnae with infrequent multicellular, gland-tipped hairs.

ovate-lanceolate to deltate, 1–3-pinnate-pinnatifid, gradually reduced distally to a pinnatifid apex, membranaceous to herbaceous.

Pinnae

usually perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate;

proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged, basal basiscopic pinnules sessile to short-stalked, base truncate to obtuse;

distal pinnae ovate to oblong.

not articulate to rachis, segment margins crenulate, dentate, or serrate;

proximal pinnae not reduced or 1 pair slightly reduced, sessile or petiolulate, equilateral or ± inequilateral, if inequilateral basiscopic side more narrowly cuneate;

costae adaxially grooved, grooves continuous from rachis to costae;

indument absent or of uniseriate, multicellular hairs in pinnae axils or of unicellular, gland-tipped hairs abaxially, absent adaxially.

Veins

directed into teeth and notches.

free, simple or forked.

Indusia

cup-shaped, apex truncate, with scattered, unicellular, gland-tipped hairs.

Sori

in 1 row between midrib and margin on ultimate segments, round;

indusia ovate to lanceolate, hoodlike and arching over sorus toward margin, attached to receptacle base on costal side, persistent to ephemeral or often obscure at maturity.

Spores

spiny, usually 38–42 µm. 2n = 168.

brownish, echinate, or verrucate.

x

= 42.

Cystopteris tennesseensis

Cystopteris

Phenology Sporulating summer–fall.
Habitat Cracks and ledges on cliffs, rarely terrestrial, often on calcareous substrates or associated with man-made habitats such as rock walls or bridge abutments
Elevation 100–500 m (300–1600 ft)
Distribution
from FNA
AL; AR; GA; IA; IL; IN; KS; KY; MD; MO; NC; OH; OK; PA; TN; VA; WI; WV
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
from USDA
Worldwide
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Cystopteris tennesseensis, an allotetraploid species, has C. bulbifera and C. protrusa as diploid progenitors. The relative distinctiveness of these diploids suggests that identification of C. tennesseensis individuals should be straightforward. As with other members of Cystopteris, however, a series of features makes reliable recognition of this tetraploid challenging. For some characteristics (occasional unicellular, gland-tipped hairs and bulblets; short-attenuate, narrowly deltate blades), it is intermediate between its parents; for others (very short internodes and crowded leaves; occurrence on rock), it tends toward C. bulbifera. This unequal intermediacy, the multiple origins from genetically different individuals (C. H. Haufler et al. 1990), and the occurrence of sterile backcross triploids with its diploid progenitors in zones of sympatry has blurred the already subtle features distinguishing this allopolyploid. For example, some individuals of C. bulbifera may have very few glandular hairs, and some C. tennesseensis appear to lack glandular hairs entirely (R. F. Blasdell 1963). Further, sterile tetraploid hybrids (called C. × wagneri R. C. Moran) between C. tennesseensis and C. tenuis have been reported (R. C. Moran 1983) and verified through isozyme analyses (C. H. Haufler, unpubl. data). Finally, as discussed above, the recently recognized C. utahensis (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991) is extremely similar morphologically to C. tennesseensis.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Cystopteris is a taxonomically difficult genus at the species level. Especially troublesome is the worldwide and polymorphic species C. fragilis sensu lato. To maintain it as a single species with several varieties would be easiest (and least controversial). This approach, however, may not accurately reflect true evolutionary history.

Although Cystopteris species are found in temperate climates worldwide at tetraploid to octaploid ploidy levels, extant diploid species are concentrated in North America. The diploid species are relatively distinct from one another and are the progenitors of numerous allopolyploid derivatives (see reticulogram). In addition, an extinct (or undiscovered) diploid may have been involved in the origin of some polyploids (shown as "C. hemifragilis" on the reticulogram).

Considerable overlap exists among the leaf morphologies in the species of Cystopteris, even among the diploid taxa. Consequently, the key requires observation of subtle and sometimes overlapping characteristics.

Several general recommendations can be made for identifying Cystopteris. (1) Field workers should be aware that whenever Cystopteris species occur together, hybridization is likely; hybrids usually have shriveled and malformed spores. (2) Species of Cystopteris frequently occur as highly reduced plants, especially in stressful habitats such as high elevations, high latitudes, and cold and/or dry climates. Such stunted plants can be fertile, but leaf and stem characters required to distinguish species can be obscured. (3) Because of the importance of examining stem and spore features in distinguishing species, collectors should always attempt to obtain complete, fertile specimens.

Species ca. 20 (9 in the flora).

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Key
1. Leaf blades elongate-pentagonal; proximal pinnae inequilateral, with enlarged basiscopic pinnules; stems cordlike, long-creeping, leaf bases more than 1 cm apart.
C. montana
1. Leaf blades elliptic to deltate; proximal pinnae equilateral or nearly so; stems not cordlike, short-creeping (leaf bases less than 0.5 cm apart) or if long-creeping, leaf bases generally less than 1 cm apart.
→ 2
2. Rachises, costae, indusia, and midribs of ultimate segments sparsely to densely covered by gland-tipped hairs; leaf blades deltate to ovate, usually widest at or near base; rachises and costae often with bulblets.
→ 3
2. Rachises, costae, indusia, and midribs of ultimate segments without glandular hairs; leaf blades elliptic to lanceolate, generally widest at or just below middle of blade; rachises and costae without bulblets.
→ 6
3. Rachises and costae frequently with bulblets; rachises, costae, indusia, and midribs of ultimate segments usually densely covered by gland-tipped hairs; leaf blades broadly to narrowly deltate, almost always widest at base, apex long-attenuate; leaves seasonally bearing sori (earliest leaves lack sori, subsequent leaves with sori); petioles reddish when young, green or straw-colored in mature specimens; spores usually 33-38 µm.
C. bulbifera
3. Rachises and costae occasionally with bulblets (often misshapen); rachises, costae, indusia, and midribs of ultimate segments usually sparsely covered by glandular hairs; leaf blades narrowly deltate to ovate-lanceolate, widest at or near base, apex short-attenuate; nearly all leaves bearing sori; petioles dark brown to straw-colored or green; spores usually 38-60 µm.
→ 4
4. Blades ovate to lanceolate, usually widest above base; spores usually 49-60 µm; ne North America.
C. laurentiana
4. Blades deltate to narrowly deltate, usually widest at or near base; spores usually 38-48 µm; e,c to sw North America.
→ 5
5. Stem scales usually dark brown, ± clathrate, cell walls dark brown, thick, luminae prominent; leaves usually with multicellular, gland-tipped hairs in axils of pinnae; sw United States.
C. utahensis
5. Stem scales usually tan to light brown, cell walls brown, thin, luminae not obvious; leaves rarely with multicellular, gland-tipped hairs in axils of pinnae; e United States (e Kansas, s Minnesota throughout East Coast area).
C. tennesseensis
6. Leaves clustered 1-4 cm behind protruding stem apex; stems pubescent, hairs yellow; spores usually 28-34 µm.
C. protrusa
6. Leaves clustered at stem apex; stems lacking hairs; spores usually 33-60 µm.
→ 7
7. Proximal pinnae pinnate-pinnatifid to 2-pinnate; stems usually long-creeping; spores usually 33-41 µm.
C. reevesiana
7. Proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid; stems short-creeping; spores usually 39-60 µm.
→ 8
8. Pinnae typically at acute angle to rachis, often curving toward blade apex; pinnae along distal 1/3 of blades ovate to narrowly elliptic; margins of pinnae usually crenulate or with rounded teeth; basal basiscopic pinnules of proximal pinnae cuneate to rounded at base.
C. tenuis
8. Pinnae typically perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex; pinnae along distal 1/3 of blade deltate to ovate; margins of pinnae with sharp teeth; basal basiscopic pinnules of proximal pinnae truncate to rounded at base.
C. fragilis
Source FNA vol. 2. FNA vol. 2. Authors: Christopher H. Haufler, Robbin C. Moran, Michael D. Windham.
Parent taxa Dryopteridaceae > Cystopteris Dryopteridaceae
Sibling taxa
C. bulbifera, C. fragilis, C. laurentiana, C. montana, C. protrusa, C. reevesiana, C. tenuis, C. utahensis
Subordinate taxa
C. bulbifera, C. fragilis, C. laurentiana, C. montana, C. protrusa, C. reevesiana, C. tennesseensis, C. tenuis, C. utahensis
Synonyms C. fragilis, C. fragilis var. tennesseensis
Name authority Shaver: J. Tennessee Acad. Sci. 25(2): 107. (1950) Bernhardi: Neues J. Bot. 1(2): 26. (1805)
Web links