Cystopteris |
Cystopteris tennesseensis |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bladder-fern, brittle fern, fragile fern |
Tennessee bladder fern |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Habit | Plants terrestrial or on rock. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stems | short- to long-creeping, stolons absent. |
creeping, not cordlike, internodes short, heavily beset with old petiole bases, hairs absent; scales usually tan to light brown, lanceolate, radial walls tan to brown, thin, luminae tan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leaves | monomorphic, dying back in winter. |
monomorphic, crowded near stem apex, to 45 cm, nearly all bearing sori. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Petiole | 1/3–3 times length of blades, base often swollen and persisting as trophopod over winter; vascular bundles 2, lateral, round or oblong in cross section. |
variable in color but mostly dark brown at base, gradually becoming straw-colored distally, shorter than blade, sparsely scaly at base. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blade | ovate-lanceolate to deltate, 1–3-pinnate-pinnatifid, gradually reduced distally to a pinnatifid apex, membranaceous to herbaceous. |
deltate to narrowly deltate, 2-pinnate-pinnatifid, usually widest at or near base, apex short-attenuate; rachis and costae with occasional unicellular, gland-tipped hairs, with or without bulblets (usually misshapen); axils of pinnae with infrequent multicellular, gland-tipped hairs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnae | not articulate to rachis, segment margins crenulate, dentate, or serrate; proximal pinnae not reduced or 1 pair slightly reduced, sessile or petiolulate, equilateral or ± inequilateral, if inequilateral basiscopic side more narrowly cuneate; costae adaxially grooved, grooves continuous from rachis to costae; indument absent or of uniseriate, multicellular hairs in pinnae axils or of unicellular, gland-tipped hairs abaxially, absent adaxially. |
usually perpendicular to rachis, not curving toward blade apex, margins serrate; proximal pinnae pinnatifid to pinnate-pinnatifid, ± equilateral, basiscopic pinnules not enlarged, basal basiscopic pinnules sessile to short-stalked, base truncate to obtuse; distal pinnae ovate to oblong. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veins | free, simple or forked. |
directed into teeth and notches. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indusia | cup-shaped, apex truncate, with scattered, unicellular, gland-tipped hairs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sori | in 1 row between midrib and margin on ultimate segments, round; indusia ovate to lanceolate, hoodlike and arching over sorus toward margin, attached to receptacle base on costal side, persistent to ephemeral or often obscure at maturity. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spores | brownish, echinate, or verrucate. |
spiny, usually 38–42 µm. 2n = 168. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
x | = 42. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cystopteris |
Cystopteris tennesseensis |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phenology | Sporulating summer–fall. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Habitat | Cracks and ledges on cliffs, rarely terrestrial, often on calcareous substrates or associated with man-made habitats such as rock walls or bridge abutments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elevation | 100–500 m (300–1600 ft) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution |
Worldwide |
AL; AR; GA; IA; IL; IN; KS; KY; MD; MO; NC; OH; OK; PA; TN; VA; WI; WV
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion | Cystopteris is a taxonomically difficult genus at the species level. Especially troublesome is the worldwide and polymorphic species C. fragilis sensu lato. To maintain it as a single species with several varieties would be easiest (and least controversial). This approach, however, may not accurately reflect true evolutionary history. Although Cystopteris species are found in temperate climates worldwide at tetraploid to octaploid ploidy levels, extant diploid species are concentrated in North America. The diploid species are relatively distinct from one another and are the progenitors of numerous allopolyploid derivatives (see reticulogram). In addition, an extinct (or undiscovered) diploid may have been involved in the origin of some polyploids (shown as "C. hemifragilis" on the reticulogram). Considerable overlap exists among the leaf morphologies in the species of Cystopteris, even among the diploid taxa. Consequently, the key requires observation of subtle and sometimes overlapping characteristics. Several general recommendations can be made for identifying Cystopteris. (1) Field workers should be aware that whenever Cystopteris species occur together, hybridization is likely; hybrids usually have shriveled and malformed spores. (2) Species of Cystopteris frequently occur as highly reduced plants, especially in stressful habitats such as high elevations, high latitudes, and cold and/or dry climates. Such stunted plants can be fertile, but leaf and stem characters required to distinguish species can be obscured. (3) Because of the importance of examining stem and spore features in distinguishing species, collectors should always attempt to obtain complete, fertile specimens. Species ca. 20 (9 in the flora). (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Cystopteris tennesseensis, an allotetraploid species, has C. bulbifera and C. protrusa as diploid progenitors. The relative distinctiveness of these diploids suggests that identification of C. tennesseensis individuals should be straightforward. As with other members of Cystopteris, however, a series of features makes reliable recognition of this tetraploid challenging. For some characteristics (occasional unicellular, gland-tipped hairs and bulblets; short-attenuate, narrowly deltate blades), it is intermediate between its parents; for others (very short internodes and crowded leaves; occurrence on rock), it tends toward C. bulbifera. This unequal intermediacy, the multiple origins from genetically different individuals (C. H. Haufler et al. 1990), and the occurrence of sterile backcross triploids with its diploid progenitors in zones of sympatry has blurred the already subtle features distinguishing this allopolyploid. For example, some individuals of C. bulbifera may have very few glandular hairs, and some C. tennesseensis appear to lack glandular hairs entirely (R. F. Blasdell 1963). Further, sterile tetraploid hybrids (called C. × wagneri R. C. Moran) between C. tennesseensis and C. tenuis have been reported (R. C. Moran 1983) and verified through isozyme analyses (C. H. Haufler, unpubl. data). Finally, as discussed above, the recently recognized C. utahensis (C. H. Haufler and M. D. Windham 1991) is extremely similar morphologically to C. tennesseensis. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source | FNA vol. 2. | FNA vol. 2. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent taxa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sibling taxa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinate taxa | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synonyms | C. fragilis, C. fragilis var. tennesseensis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name authority | Bernhardi: Neues J. Bot. 1(2): 26. (1805) | Shaver: J. Tennessee Acad. Sci. 25(2): 107. (1950) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web links |
|