Clarkia amoena subsp. whitneyi |
Onagraceae subfam. onagroideae |
|
---|---|---|
farewell to spring, Whitney's clarkia |
|
|
Stems | decumbent, to 100 cm.Inflorescences congested racemes; bracts lanceolate; internodes shorter than subtending flowers. |
|
Leaves | stipules present or absent. |
|
Flowers | petals with bright red spot mid blade, 30–60 mm; ovary broadly fusiform, 8–12 mm wide, 8-grooved, 4 deeper; stigma exserted beyond anthers. |
floral tube present or, rarely, absent; sepals 2 or 4 (very rarely 3), deciduous with floral tube, petals, and stamens; petals yellow, white, pink, red, rarely in combination. |
x |
||
2n | = 14. |
|
Clarkia amoena subsp. whitneyi |
Onagraceae subfam. onagroideae |
|
Phenology | Flowering Jul–Aug. | |
Habitat | Coastal scrub. | |
Elevation | 0–100 m. (0–300 ft.) | |
Distribution |
CA |
North America; Mexico; Central America; South America; West Indies; Eurasia; Pacific Islands (New Zealand, Society Islands); Australia |
Discussion | Subspecies whitneyi is common in cultivation, mostly as hybrid derivatives with other subspecies, but is scarce in the wild, found only rarely along the coast in Humboldt and Mendocino counties; it is listed as rare by the California Native Plant Society. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Genera 21, species 582 (16 genera, 246 species in the flora). Onagroideae encompass the main lineage of the family, after the early branching of Ludwigia (R. A. Levin et al. 2003, 2004). This large and diverse lineage is distinguished by the presence of a floral tube beyond the apex of the ovary; sepals deciduous with the floral tube, petals, and stamens; pollen shed in monads (or tetrads in Chylismia sect. Lignothera and all but one species of Epilobium); ovular vascular system exclusively transseptal (R. H. Eyde 1981); ovule archesporium multicellular (H. Tobe and P. H. Raven 1996); and change in base chromosome number from x = 8 in Ludwigia to x = 10 or x = 11 at the base of Onagroideae (Raven 1979; Levin et al. 2003). Molecular work (Levin et al. 2003, 2004) substantially supports the traditional tribal classification (P. A. Munz 1965; Raven 1979, 1988); tribes are recognized to delimit major branches within the phylogeny of Onagroideae, where the branches comprise strongly supported monophyletic groups of one or more genera. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 10. | FNA vol. 10. |
Parent taxa | ||
Sibling taxa | ||
Subordinate taxa | ||
Synonyms | Oenothera whitneyi, Godetia whitneyi | |
Name authority | (A. Gray) H. Lewis & M. E. Lewis: Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 20: 265. (1955) | W. L. Wagner & Hoch: Syst. Bot. Monogr. 83: 41. (2007) |
Web links |
|