The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

San Diego golden star

golden star

Habit Herbs, perennial, scapose, from fibrous-coated corms.
Leaves

2–8, 6–15 cm × 1–3 mm.

1–8, basal;

blade linear-lanceolate, keeled, margins entire.

Scape

15–70 cm, minutely scabrous.

slender, cylindrical, rigid.

Inflorescences

umbellate, open, 10–35-flowered, bracteate;

bracts 2–4, scarious, membranous, not enclosing flower buds.

Flowers

tepals abruptly spreading from base, distinct, yellow with green midvein, 5–10 mm;

filaments leaning away from style, leaving dilated bases separated and therefore not forming nectariferous cup, 3–5 mm;

anthers 0.4–1 mm;

ovary 2–3 mm;

style 2–3 mm, equal to or shorter than ovary;

pedicel 0.5–6.5 cm. 

tepals 6, persistent, widely spreading, distinct or barely connate at base, golden yellow, striped brownish or green, nearly equal, oblong-linear, subrotate at anthesis;

stamens 6, epitepalous, slightly shorter than and inserted at base of tepals;

filaments filiform distally, dilated basally, ca. 6 mm, dilated bases sometimes connate into nectariferous cup, cup sometimes having basal filament appendages arising from apex;

anthers subbasifixed, versatile;

pistil 3-carpellate;

ovary superior, sessile, 3-locular, ovules anatropous, several per locule;

style persistent, splitting with capsule, filiform or clavate, 5 mm;

stigma 3-lobed;

pedicel long, erect, ray-like, base and apex articulate.

Fruits

sessile, capsular, 3-angled, subglobose, 5–6 mm, dehiscence loculicidal.

Seeds

black, angular, subovoid, wrinkled, coat with crust.

x

= 9 (except for B. clevelandii x = 14).

Bloomeria clevelandii

Bloomeria

Phenology Flowering spring (Apr–Jun).
Habitat Coastal scrub
Elevation 0–100 m (0–300 ft)
Distribution
from FNA
CA; n Mexico (Baja California)
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
from USDA
c and s Calif; Mexico (n Baja California)
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Bloomeria clevelandii is restricted to western San Diego County and northern Baja California. Recent evidence suggests that this species is not closely related to Muilla, but rather to Bloomeria and Triteleia, and probably should be placed in a separate, monotypic genus (J. C. Pires 2000). Previous taxonomic keys have focused on the shape of the dilated filament bases, but the orientation of the stamens and the unfused filament bases are more reliably diagnostic.

The species is in cultivation, and the corms were probably eaten by native Americans.

of conservation concern

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Species 3 (3 in the flora).

J. W. Ingram (1953) considered Bloomeria to be closely related to Brodiaea, Muilla, and Allium. R. F. Hoover (1941, 1955), on the other hand, considered it to be closely related to Triteleia, on the basis of corm morphology, keeled leaves, umbel structure, versatile anthers distant from the style, filament appendages, a stigma with three small lobes, similar seeds, and the same base chromosome number. However, Bloomeria differs generally from Triteleia in that it has distinct tepals and a sessile ovary, although the tepals of some B. crocea are slightly connate at the base, and T. ixioides has a very short perianth tube. Hoover kept the two genera separate on the basis of the stipitate ovary and geographic distribution. Triteleia rarely occurs south of the Tehachapi and the Santa Lucia Mountains in California, where Bloomeria occurs.

Among the most important diagnostic characters within Bloomeria are features of the androecium, particularly the orientation of the stamens relative to the style, and the appendages at the dilated bases of the filaments. These characters are easily seen in the field with a hand lens. When collecting flowering specimens, one should make a point of preparing a few dissected flowers in a manner that displays these critical characters.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Key
1. Filaments leaning away from style, leaving dilated bases separated and therefore not forming nectariferous cup; style shorter than or equal to ovary; leaves 2–8, 1–3 mm wide.
B. clevelandii
1. Filaments parallel to style, dilated bases connate into nectariferous cup; style longer than ovary; leaves 1–2, 3–15 mm wide.
→ 2
2. Scape 15–70 cm; tepals abruptly spreading at base; leaves usually 1.
B. crocea
2. Scape 5–10 cm; tepals ascending at base, then gradually spreading; leaves usually 1–2.
B. humilis
Source FNA vol. 26, p. 337. FNA vol. 26, p. 336. Author: J. Chris Pires.
Parent taxa Liliaceae > Bloomeria Liliaceae
Sibling taxa
B. crocea, B. humilis
Subordinate taxa
B. clevelandii, B. crocea, B. humilis
Synonyms Muilla clevelandii
Name authority S. Watson: Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 20: 376. (1885) Kellogg: Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2: 11. (1863)
Web links