The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

Bigelow sage, Bigelow sagebrush, Bigelow sagewort, Bigelow's sage

armoise, artemisia, felon-herb, herbe saint-jean, mugwort, sagebrush, sagewort, sailor's-tobacco, wormwood

Habit Shrubs, 20–40(–60) cm (branched from bases, rounded), mildly aromatic; not root-sprouting. Annuals, biennials, perennials, subshrubs, or shrubs, 3–350 cm (usually, rarely not, aromatic).
Stems

silvery, canescent (bark gray-brown).

1–10+, usually erect, usually branched, glabrous or hairy (hairs basi- or medifixed).

Leaves

persistent, light gray-green;

blades narrowly cuneate, 0.5–3 × 0.2–0.5 cm, entire or 3(–5)-lobed (lobes 1.5–2 mm, less than 1/3 blade lengths, acute), faces silvery canescent.

basal or basal and cauline; alternate;

petiolate or sessile;

blades filiform, linear, lanceolate, ovate, elliptic, oblong, oblanceolate, obovate, cuneate, flabellate, or spatulate, usually pinnately and/or palmately lobed, sometimes apically ± 3-lobed or -toothed, or entire, faces glabrous or hairy (hairs multicelled and filled with aromatic terpenoids and/or 1-celled and hollow, dolabriform, T-shaped).

Involucres

globose, 2–3 × 1.5–2.5 mm.

campanulate, globose, ovoid, or turbinate, 1.5–8 mm diam.

Receptacles

flat, convex, or conic (glabrous or hairy), epaleate (except paleate in A. palmeri).

Florets

pistillate 0–2 (raylike, laminae to 1 mm);

bisexual 1–3;

corollas 1–1.5 mm (style branches of ray florets elongate, exsert, epapillate, tips acute; of disc florets, short, truncate, papillate).

Ray florets

0 (peripheral pistillate florets in disciform heads usually 1–20, their corollas filiform; corollas of 1–3 pistillate florets in heads of A. bigelovii sometimes ± 2-lobed, weakly raylike).

Disc florets

2–20(–30+), bisexual and fertile, or functionally staminate;

corollas (glabrous or ± hirtellous) usually pale yellow, rarely red, tubes ± cylindric, throats subglobose or funnelform, lobes 5, ± deltate.

Phyllaries

(8–15) ovate, canescent or tomentose.

persistent, 2–20+ in 4–7 series, distinct, (usually green to whitish green, rarely stramineous) ovate to lanceolate, unequal, margins and apices (usually green or white, rarely dark brown or black) ± scarious (abaxial faces glabrous or hairy).

Heads

(usually nodding) in arrays 6–25 × 1–4 cm (branches erect, somewhat curved).

usually discoid, sometimes disciform (subradiate in A. bigelovii), in relatively broad, paniculiform arrays, or in relatively narrow, racemiform or spiciform arrays.

Cypselae

(ellipsoid, 5-ribbed) 0.8–1 mm, glabrous.

(brown) fusiform, ribs 0 (and faces finely striate) or 2–5, faces glabrous or hairy (not villous), often gland-dotted (pericarps sometimes with myxogenic cells, without resin sacs; embryo sac development monosporic);

pappi usually 0 (coroniform in A. californica and A. papposa, sometimes on outer in A. rothrockii).

x

= 9.

2n

= 18, 36, 72.

Artemisia bigelovii

Artemisia

Phenology Flowering early summer–late fall.
Habitat Deserts, sandy or alkaline soils, rock outcrops
Elevation 1000–2500 m (3300–8200 ft)
Distribution
from FNA
AZ; CA; CO; NM; NV; TX; UT
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
from USDA
Mostly Northern Hemisphere (North America, Eurasia); some in South America and Africa
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Artemisia bigelovii of the southwestern deserts is easily confused in the field with A. tridentata, even though it is well distinguished ecologically and morphologically. Systematic placement within subg. Tridentatae remains problematic. Presence of “ray” florets (though rare) and vestigial spines on the pollen (R. P. Wodehouse 1935) suggest a relationship with groups ancestral to Tridentatae. The species also has the unusual characteristic of lignified trichomes (L. M. Shultz 1986b). Further research may help to determine proper placement; its affinities may be with members of subg. Artemisia.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

species ca. 350–500 (50 in the flora)

As circumscribed here, there are five subgenera in Artemisia; four are represented in the flora area.

Etymologies of the common names used for Artemisia species provide glimpses of their uses and demonstrate the rich diversity within the genus. The common name ‘mugwort’ is from the Old English mucgwyrt, mucg meaning ‘midge,’ and refers to the use of Old World herbaceous species in repelling flies and midges. Artemisia was called Motherwort in nineteenth century Maine (as an indication of the high esteem for this otherwise rather pedestrian plant), and in the herbal by R. Banckes (1525): “This herb helpeth a woman to conceyve a chylde, and clenseth the mother, and maketh a woman to have her flowers.” Early settlers in North America brought European plants of A. dracunculus, A. vulgaris, A. absinthium, and A. abrotanum into their herb gardens for seasoning and medicinal uses; they would also have learned about aboriginal uses of Artemisia species native to North America, uses that included fertility rites (sagebrush in western North America) and antihelminthics (wormwoods of grasslands and mountain habitats). Immigrants used A. annua (sweet Annie) in potpourris and later recognized its utility as an anti-malarial drug, a use that was well known in oriental medicine. ‘Bulwand’ is the local name used for herbaceous wormwoods in Scotland, and ‘green-ginger’ and ‘Sailor’s tobacco’ are local names in England (T. Coffey 1993). Use of the names ‘sagewort’ and ‘sagebrush’ in North America arise from the familiar aroma of culinary sage, Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae). Because true sages (Salvia) and sagewort/sagebrushes (Artemisia) are in separate families, the chemical similarities are an example of convergent evolution. The intense aroma and bitter taste of the plants from terpenoids and sesquiterpene lactones discourages herbivory and undoubtedly has contributed to the remarkable evolutionary success (measured by abundance as well as diversity) of species in this genus.

Members of Artemisia are wind-pollinated and their heads and florets are exceptionally small (even for composites) and, consequently, difficult to examine and assess. Nevertheless, the sexual constitution of floral heads is important in recognition of subgenera. Plant habits and ornamentations of receptacles have also figured in arriving at subgeneric circumscriptions; additional characteristics are enumerated in the descriptions.

Artemisia has a well-deserved reputation for being taxonomically difficult. The number of subgenera varies from four to five in modern treatments, and the number of taxa recognized at the species or subspecific levels varies between 250 and 500 (K. Bremer and C. J. Humphries 1993; H. M. Hall and F. E. Clements 1923; Y. R. Ling 1982, 1995; P. P. Poljakov 1961; M. Torrell et al. 1999). In this treatment, I recognize four native subgenera; subg. Seriphidium is endemic to Asia. In the flora area, the greatest diversity occurs in subg. Artemisia. Subgenus Absinthium can be segregated on the basis of hairs on the receptacle; it may be not phylogenetically distinct (L. E. Watson et al. 2002; J. Valles and E. D. McArthur 2001). Subgenus Dracunculus is clearly distinguished by molecular differences, and subg. Tridentatae is well defined with the exception of A. pygmaea.

This treatment is based on extensive fieldwork, review of recent research, and examination of thousands of specimens; taxonomic circumscriptions remain controversial. Molecular analyses have helped define subgenera but have not clarified relationships between closely related species. The morphologic characters useful in distinguishing species tend to be variable and are often hard to assess (i.e., the sexuality of microscopic florets). Users of the keys will meet with frustrations; descriptions of subgenera and illustrations will help in defining the major groupings of species.

The subgenera are arranged in approximate phylogenetic order; species are arranged alphabetically within the subgenera. Molecular studies define subg. Dracunculus as a major clade that is ancestral to the majority of Artemisia. The subgenera Absinthium, Tridentatae, and Artemisia can be classified as clades; they are weakly supported by molecular evidence.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Key
1. Shrubs; leaves in lateral fascicles (on vegetative shoots); heads discoid (except in A. bigelovii with, rarely, 1–2 raylike florets): florets bisexual (corollas 5-lobed); receptacles glabrous.
subg. Tridentatae
1. Annuals, biennials, perennials, or subshrubs (shrubs in A. filifolia, A. californica, and A. nesiotica); leaves not in fascicles; heads usually disciform, rarely discoid; receptacles glabrous or villous
→ 2
2. Disc florets functionally staminate (not setting fruits), corollas subglobose
subg. Drancunculus
2. Disc florets usually bisexual and fertile (sometimes functionally staminate in A. packardiae in subg. Artemisia), corollas funnelform
→ 3
3. Receptacles villous
subg. Absinthium
3. Receptacles glabrous (paleate in A. palmeri)
subg. Artemisia
Source FNA vol. 19, p. 512. FNA vol. 19, p. 503. Author: Leila M. Shultz.
Parent taxa Asteraceae > tribe Anthemideae > Artemisia > subg. Tridentatae Asteraceae > tribe Anthemideae
Sibling taxa
A. abrotanum, A. absinthium, A. alaskana, A. aleutica, A. annua, A. arbuscula, A. biennis, A. borealis, A. californica, A. campestris, A. cana, A. carruthii, A. douglasiana, A. dracunculus, A. filifolia, A. franserioides, A. frigida, A. furcata, A. globularia, A. glomerata, A. laciniata, A. longifolia, A. ludoviciana, A. michauxiana, A. nesiotica, A. norvegica, A. nova, A. packardiae, A. palmeri, A. papposa, A. pattersonii, A. pedatifida, A. pontica, A. porteri, A. pycnocephala, A. pygmaea, A. rigida, A. rothrockii, A. rupestris, A. scopulorum, A. senjavinensis, A. serrata, A. spiciformis, A. stelleriana, A. suksdorfii, A. tilesii, A. tridentata, A. tripartita, A. vulgaris
Subordinate taxa
A. subg. Absinthium, A. subg. Artemisia, A. subg. Drancunculus, A. subg. Tridentatae
Synonyms A. petrophila, Seriphidium bigelovii
Name authority A. Gray: in War Department [U.S.], Pacif. Railr. Rep. 4(5): 110. (1857) Linnaeus: Sp. Pl. 2: 845. (1753): Gen. Pl. ed. 5, 367. (1754)
Web links