Artemisia bigelovii |
|
---|---|
Bigelow sage, Bigelow sagebrush, Bigelow sagewort, Bigelow's sage |
|
Habit | Shrubs, 20–40(–60) cm (branched from bases, rounded), mildly aromatic; not root-sprouting. |
Stems | silvery, canescent (bark gray-brown). |
Leaves | persistent, light gray-green; blades narrowly cuneate, 0.5–3 × 0.2–0.5 cm, entire or 3(–5)-lobed (lobes 1.5–2 mm, less than 1/3 blade lengths, acute), faces silvery canescent. |
Involucres | globose, 2–3 × 1.5–2.5 mm. |
Florets | pistillate 0–2 (raylike, laminae to 1 mm); bisexual 1–3; corollas 1–1.5 mm (style branches of ray florets elongate, exsert, epapillate, tips acute; of disc florets, short, truncate, papillate). |
Phyllaries | (8–15) ovate, canescent or tomentose. |
Heads | (usually nodding) in arrays 6–25 × 1–4 cm (branches erect, somewhat curved). |
Cypselae | (ellipsoid, 5-ribbed) 0.8–1 mm, glabrous. |
2n | = 18, 36, 72. |
Artemisia bigelovii |
|
Phenology | Flowering early summer–late fall. |
Habitat | Deserts, sandy or alkaline soils, rock outcrops |
Elevation | 1000–2500 m (3300–8200 ft) |
Distribution |
AZ; CA; CO; NM; NV; TX; UT
|
Discussion | Artemisia bigelovii of the southwestern deserts is easily confused in the field with A. tridentata, even though it is well distinguished ecologically and morphologically. Systematic placement within subg. Tridentatae remains problematic. Presence of “ray” florets (though rare) and vestigial spines on the pollen (R. P. Wodehouse 1935) suggest a relationship with groups ancestral to Tridentatae. The species also has the unusual characteristic of lignified trichomes (L. M. Shultz 1986b). Further research may help to determine proper placement; its affinities may be with members of subg. Artemisia. (Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.) |
Source | FNA vol. 19, p. 512. |
Parent taxa | Asteraceae > tribe Anthemideae > Artemisia > subg. Tridentatae |
Sibling taxa | |
Synonyms | A. petrophila, Seriphidium bigelovii |
Name authority | A. Gray: in War Department [U.S.], Pacif. Railr. Rep. 4(5): 110. (1857) |
Web links |