The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

California red fir, magnificant silver fir, red fir, Shasta red fir, silvertip fir

amabilis fir, lovely fir, Pacific silver fir, sapin gracieux, silver fir

Habit Trees to 57m; trunk to 2.5m diam.; crown narrowly conic. Trees to 75m; trunk to 2.6m diam.; crown spirelike, with age becoming flat topped, cylindric.
Bark

grayish, thin, with age thickening and becoming deeply furrowed with ridges being often 4 times wider than furrows, plates reddish.

gray, thin, smooth, with age breaking into scaly plates.

Branches

ascending in upper crown, descending in lower crown;

twigs opposite to whorled, light yellow to ± tan, reddish pubescent for 1–2 years.

diverging from trunk at right angles, short, stiff;

twigs mostly opposite, darker brown abaxially, light brown adaxially, pubescence tan.

Buds

hidden by leaves or exposed, usually dark brown, ovoid, small, not resinous or with resin drop near tip, apex rounded;

basal scales short, broad, equilaterally triangular, densely pubescent, not resinous, margins entire to crenate, apex sharp-pointed.

hidden by leaves or exposed, brown, globose, small, resinous (at least apically), apex rounded;

basal scales short, broad, triangular, densely pubescent, usually not resinous, margins entire, apex sharp-pointed.

Leaves

2–3.7cm × 2mm, mostly 1-ranked, flexible, the proximal portion often appressed to twig for 2–3mm (best seen on abaxial surface of twig), distal portion divergent;

cross section flat, with or without weak groove adaxially toward leaf base, or cross section 3–4-sided on fertile branches;

odor camphorlike;

abaxial surface with 2 glaucous bands, each band with 4–5 stomatal rows;

adaxial surface blue-green to silvery blue, with single glaucous band that may divide into 2 toward leaf base, band with (8–)10(–13) stomatal rows at midleaf;

apex rounded or, on fertile branches, somewhat pointed;

resin canals small, near margins and abaxial epidermal layer.

(0.7–)1–2.5cm × 1–3mm, mostly 2-ranked, flexible, ± concealing the adaxial surface of the twigs (especially in mid to upper crown), some leaves forwardly directed, others usually longer and spreading horizontally, proximal portion ± straight;

cross section flat, prominently grooved adaxially;

odor pungent;

abaxial surface with 5–6 stomatal rows on each side of midrib;

adaxial surface dark, lustrous green, lacking stomates;

apex prominently notched;

resin canals small, near margins and abaxial epidermal layer.

Pollen cones

at pollination ± purple or reddish brown.

at pollination red, becoming reddish yellow.

Seed(s)

cones oblong-cylindric, 15–20 × 7–10cm, purple at first but becoming yellowish brown or greenish brown, sessile, apex round;

scales ca. 3 × 4cm, pubescent;

bracts included to exserted and reflexed (Shasta red fir) over scales.

cones cylindric, 8–10(–13) × 3.5–5cm, purple, sessile, apex round to nipple-shaped;

scales ca. 2 × 2cm, pubescent;

bracts included.

2n

=24.

Abies magnifica

Abies amabilis

Habitat Mixed coniferous forests Moist, coastal coniferous forests
Elevation 1400–2700m (4600–8900ft) 0–2000m (0–6600ft)
Distribution
from FNA
CA; NV; OR
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
from FNA
AK; CA; OR; WA; BC
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Abies magnifica often exists in extensive high elevation stands in the Sierra Nevada; its close relative A. procera occurs in small mountaintop populations relatively isolated from one another. As expected for isolated populations, A. procera produces large interpopulation variation in morphology (J.Maze and W.H. Parker 1983) and chemistry (E.Zavarin et al. 1978). Where the two species meet in southern Oregon and northern California, many populations are intermediate; these have been called A. magnifica var. shastensis Lemmon. The status of such intermediates is unsettled. They may be accepted as hybrids between A. magnifica and A. procera (Liu T. S. 1971) or, alternatively, the paleontological record suggests that the two species may have originated from the intermediates (E.Zavarin et al. 1978). Individuals from this region should be assigned to A. magnifica, A. procera, or A. magnifica × procera (E.L. Parker 1963), depending on the morphologic criteria selected to differentiate the species, though clearly these individuals are genetically quite different from those near the type localities of the two species.

An extensive study of this variation, as proposed by E.Zavarin et al. (1978), is warranted. Such a study should consider data from the type localities as a basis of comparison. Moreover, to evaluate this situation critically, one should first determine if any genetic exchange occurs between Abies lasiocarpa and A. procera that may complicate an evaluation.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)

Source FNA vol. 2. FNA vol. 2.
Parent taxa Pinaceae > Abies Pinaceae > Abies
Sibling taxa
A. amabilis, A. balsamea, A. bifolia, A. bracteata, A. concolor, A. fraseri, A. grandis, A. lasiocarpa, A. lowiana, A. procera
A. balsamea, A. bifolia, A. bracteata, A. concolor, A. fraseri, A. grandis, A. lasiocarpa, A. lowiana, A. magnifica, A. procera
Name authority A. Murray bis: Proc. Roy. Hort. Soc. London 3: 318. (1863) Douglas ex J. Forbes: Pinet. Woburn. 125, plate 44. (1839)
Web links