The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

ragwort

Habit Herbs annual, biennial, or perennial, 3–100+ cm; caudices rhizomatous or taprooted, often with thin, branched, fibrous roots.
Stems

single or clustered; erect, glabrous or pubescent.

Leaves

alternate;

basal and cauline;

blades elliptic, lanceolate, linear, lyrate, orbiculate; ovate, reniform, or spatulate, often pinnately lobed to pinnatifid or pinnatisect;

margins entire or crenate, dentate, or serrate to denticulate, pinnately veined;

cauline much reduced; upper leaves bract-like, petiolate or sessile.

Inflorescences

terminal heads; in compact or open corymb-, cyme-, or subumbel-like arrays, rarely heads solitary.

Involucres

campanulate to cylindric.

Receptacles

flat;

paleae 0.

Ray florets

0 or 5–13, pistillate, fertile, pale yellow to orange-red.

Disc florets

20–80+; bisexual, fertile;

corollas pale yellow to orange-red;

tubes ? campanulate;

lobes 5; erect to recurved, usually ± deltate;

style branch tips usually truncate.

Phyllaries

persistent, 8, 13, or 21 in 1 series.

Calyculi

0 or 1–5+ bractlets.

Fruits

cylindric, tan to dark brown, glabrous or pubescent;

ribs usually 5–10, pappi of white, barbellulate bristles.

Heads

radiate or discoid.

Packera breweri

Packera

Distribution
[WildflowerSearch map]
[BONAP county map]
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

North America. 66 species; 10 species treated in Flora.

Packera is a segregate of Senecio. It contains species that were traditionally referred to as “aureoid senecios,” an informal group that was first recognized by Asa Gray. Base chromosome numbers of x=22 or 23 (as opposed to x=10) and a suite of morphological characters have traditionally been used in the circumscription of the genus. More recent molecular and palynological studies lend good support for the recognition of the genus. Species boundaries in the genus are notoriously imprecise, and polyploidy is common. Some species hybridize to some extent with others whenever they come into contact, while others are never known to hybridize. Authors of some studies on the more widespread species propose dividing the species into many varieties based on subtle differences in vegetative morphology, which are often overlapping and inconsistent, and on populational differences due to polyploidy. While recognizing the value of such work in understanding evolutionary relationships, I have taken the view that splitting these species into many varieties based on these difficult characters does little to help with their identification in the field, and these proposed varieties are not supported by molecular data.

Source Flora of Oregon, volume 2, page 320
Debra Trock
Sibling taxa
P. bolanderi, P. cana, P. eurycephala, P. flettii, P. hesperia, P. macounii, P. porteri, P. pseudaurea, P. streptanthifolia, P. subnuda
Subordinate taxa
P. bolanderi, P. cana, P. eurycephala, P. flettii, P. hesperia, P. macounii, P. porteri, P. pseudaurea, P. streptanthifolia, P. subnuda
Web links